🔬 Arctic Satellites Fooled Scientists for 60 Years—What Else Are We Getting Wrong? episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 7, 2026 · 8 MIN

🔬 Arctic Satellites Fooled Scientists for 60 Years—What Else Are We Getting Wrong?

from 🎙️ Science News Daily | Peer Review'd · host Peer Review'd

This episode uncovers how six decades of satellite data misled climate scientists about Arctic snow cover—technology improvements were masquerading as environmental changes. We explore researchers combining caffeine with CRISPR for cancer treatment, UCLA chemists creating 'impossible' molecular bonds that violate textbook rules, and a disturbing machine learning analysis flagging potentially fabricated cancer research. Plus: how ovarian cancer hijacks your immune system, quantum physicists measuring time without clocks, and three existing drugs that might already fight Alzheimer's.Subscribe to Peer Review'd Newsletter: https://peerreviewd.com/Love Science? Check out our other Science tools: 60sec.site and Artificial Intelligence Radio

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Feb 7, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

🔬 Arctic Satellites Fooled Scientists for 60 Years—What Else Are We Getting Wrong?

0:00 8:56

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of 🎙️ Science News Daily | Peer Review'd?

This episode is 8 minutes long.

When was this 🎙️ Science News Daily | Peer Review'd episode published?

This episode was published on February 7, 2026.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this 🎙️ Science News Daily | Peer Review'd episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!