Are elbows indecent? Minnesota’s bizarre legal argument episode artwork

EPISODE · Oct 11, 2024 · 7 MIN

Are elbows indecent? Minnesota’s bizarre legal argument

from Planet Nude · host Planet Nude

The Minnesota Supreme Court is currently deliberating a case that could potentially redefine the boundaries of indecent exposure, at least in the state. At the center of the debate is Eloisa Rubi Plancarte, who was convicted after walking through a gas station parking lot with her breasts uncovered. While the case has sparked discussions on gender equality, the state’s attorney introduced an even more perplexing argument. He suggested that under the current law, even exposing an elbow could theoretically violate Minnesota’s indecent exposure statute. When Associate Justice Karl Procaccini asked if the statute could apply to any body part, Jim Haase, the attorney representing the state, responded, “I would say it’s conceivable.”Read the original article at www(dot)planetnude(dot)co This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.planetnude.co/subscribe

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 11, 2024

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Are elbows indecent? Minnesota’s bizarre legal argument

0:00 7:15

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Planet Nude?

This episode is 7 minutes long.

When was this Planet Nude episode published?

This episode was published on October 11, 2024.

Can I download this Planet Nude episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!