Skip to content
Are Elected Islamists Better Than Dictators? episode artwork

Oct 9, 2012 52 min

Are Elected Islamists Better Than Dictators?

from Open to Debate Hosted by Open to Debate

The popular uprisings of the Arab Spring have left a leadership void that Islamist parties have been quick to fill. A longtime supporter of former strongmen like Egypt's Mubarak and Tunisia's Ben Ali, the U.S. now faces the uncomfortable result of Arab democracy - the rise of Islamist parties that are less amenable to the West than their autocratic predecessors. Will the Islamists, who once embraced violence, slowly liberalize as they face the difficulties of state leadership? Or will it mean the growth of anti-Americanism and radicalization in the region? Reuel Marc Gerecht, Brian Katulis, Daniel Pipes and Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser debate the motion: "Better elected Islamists than dictators." Debate moderated by author and ABC News correspondent John Donvan.

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Are Elected Islamists Better Than Dictators?

0:00 52:30

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Open to Debate?

This episode is 52 minutes long.

When was this Open to Debate episode published?

This episode was published on October 9, 2012.

Can I download this Open to Debate episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.