EPISODE · Mar 3, 2009
Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle
from U.S. Supreme Court 2008 Term Arguments
A case in which the Court found that regardless of whether the petitioner is eligible for a stay, a federal court of appeals has jurisdiction over a motion to stay under Section 16(a)(1) of the Federal Arbitration Act.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle
0:00
0:00
1×
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.
Frequently Asked Questions
When was this U.S. Supreme Court 2008 Term Arguments episode published?
This episode was published on March 3, 2009.
Can I download this U.S. Supreme Court 2008 Term Arguments episode?
Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!