Asking a Constitutional Expert About the Voice to Parliament Part 2: High Court and Legal Impact

Will the Voice to Parliament be a third chamber? Can it veto legislation or be given veto power? And will we see a bunch of High Court challenges as a result of the Voice to Parliament if it passes? Well, instead of wild speculation in the comments section - why don't we ask Professor Anne Twomey, a constitutional expert, and dispel some misinformation and learn what experts ACTUALLY believe about the Voice to Parliament. Listen to Part 1 here if you missed it: https://spotifyanchor-web.app.link/e/NNEV4w23kBb I highly recommend you watch Anne Twomey's Youtube channel Constitution Clarion to learn more: https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalclarion1901 Here are some other reliable resources on the Voice to Parliament: ANU Info: https://reporter.anu.edu.au/all-stories/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-voice University of Melbourne VoiceFACTS: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhOObpoQndRmwcXPvddSgZWKBt4ewtBJF Conversations About the Voice: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhOObpoQndRl0hyqVOvENjNdjULrFkcn8 RMIT FactLab: https://www.rmit.edu.au/about/schools-colleges/media-and-communication/industry/factlab/debunking-misinformation Enjoy! Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplained Like Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388 Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.