Background and implications of the Wright v Troy Lucas & Rusz case

from The Gatehouse Chambers Legal Podcast · host Gatehouse Chambers

Wright v Troy Lucas & George Rusz [2019] EWHC 1098 (QB)Freeman v Marshall & Co [1966] EGD 695

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Sep 26, 2019

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

What this episode covers

Colm Nugent explains the background and implications of the Wright v Troy Lucas & Rusz case in discussion with Laurence Page. This podcast covers: 1. facts of the underlying case 2. role of a McKenzie friend 3. duties of McKenzie friends and the degree to which they are subject to scrutiny 4. what is being done to alter the legal position regarding McKenzie friends

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

Background and implications of the Wright v Troy Lucas & Rusz case

0:00 17:51

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Gatehouse Chambers Legal Podcast?

This episode is 17 minutes long.

When was this The Gatehouse Chambers Legal Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on September 26, 2019.

Can I download this The Gatehouse Chambers Legal Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!