Backup backup backup backup argument

from Divided Argument · host Will Baude & Dan Epps

We recap and reflect on the oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara (the birthright citizenship case) and then analyze the Court's recent decision in Chiles v. Salazar, about the First Amendment limits on Colorado's conversion therapy ban. We also confront the taboo question: Are judicial opinions too long?

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 6, 2026

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

Ready to play

Backup backup backup backup argument

0:00 1:17:53

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

The Big View Reuters Reuters Breakingviews columnists tap their best contacts to explore the biggest issues driving business and markets today. Every Tuesday, Global Editor Peter Thal Larsen and his team tackle a pressing question with a senior executive, financier, policymaker, or other expert. The Big View helps you understand what is going on, explore all sides of the argument, and think about what happens next. [For previous The Exchange podcast users, we didn't want to leave you hanging so we've decided to repurpose this feed for the launch of The Big View podcast. You can still find the legacy episodes below marked under the old title]

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Divided Argument?

This episode is 1 hour and 17 minutes long.

When was this Divided Argument episode published?

This episode was published on April 6, 2026.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this Divided Argument episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!