Banking Litigation Podcast EP15: Monthly Update – February 2020 episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 25, 2020 · 18 MIN

Banking Litigation Podcast EP15: Monthly Update – February 2020

from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer Podcasts · host Herbert Smith Freehills Podcasts

In our monthly update podcast, we look at key recent judgments likely to be of interest to financial institutions. This episode is hosted by John Corrie, a partner in our banking litigation team, who is joined by Ceri Morgan and special guest Daniel May.You can find links to our blog posts on the cases covered in this podcast below:High Court grants proprietary injunction against Bitcoin exchange holding proceeds of ransomware attack - https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2020/02/03/high-court-grants-proprietary-injunction-against-bitcoin-exchange-holding-proceeds-of-ransomware-attack/High Court upholds financial institution restructuring unit’s exercise of its powers under facility agreement following borrower default, finding there was no “relational contract” and rejecting claims for intimidation and economic duress - https://hsfnotes.com/bankinglitigation/2020/02/13/high-court-upholds-financial-institution-restructuring-units-exercise-of-its-powers-under-facility-agreement-following-borrower-default-finding-there-was-no-relational-contract-and-rejec/High Court strikes out claim against banks in their capacity as lenders to investors of a tax deferral scheme - https://hsfnotes.com/bankinglitigation/2020/01/21/high-court-strikes-out-claim-against-banks-in-their-capacity-as-lenders-to-investors-of-a-tax-deferral-scheme/Joint Operating agreement arguably a "relational contract" but Commercial Court declines to imply duty of good faith or Braganza duty - https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2020/02/03/joint-operating-agreement-arguably-a-relational-contract-but-commercial-court-declines-to-imply-duty-of-good-faith-or-braganza-duty/Court of Appeal finds legal advice privilege is subject to a “dominant purpose” test - https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2020/01/30/court-of-appeal-finds-legal-advice-privilege-is-subject-to-a-dominant-purpose-test/Don't forget to subscribe to the banking litigation blog - https://hsfnotes.com/bankinglitigation/subscribe/

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Feb 25, 2020

Embed this episode

In our monthly update podcast, we look at key recent judgments likely to be of interest to financial institutions. This episode is hosted by John Corrie, a partner in our banking litigation team, who is joined by Ceri Morgan and special guest Daniel May.You can find links to our blog posts on the cases covered in this podcast below:High Court grants proprietary injunction against Bitcoin exchange holding proceeds of ransomware attack - https://hsfnotes.com/litigation/2020/02/03/high-court-gra...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

Banking Litigation Podcast EP15: Monthly Update – February 2020

0:00 18:41

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer Podcasts?

This episode is 18 minutes long.

When was this Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer Podcasts episode published?

This episode was published on February 25, 2020.

Can I download this Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer Podcasts episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!