Skip to content
Barr v. Lee episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 5, 2020 · 14 MIN

Barr v. Lee

from Supreme Court Opinions · host Dwight Allen

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 20A8 _________________ WILLIAM P. BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. v. DANIEL LEWIS LEE, ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR STAY OR VACATUR [July 14, 2020] PER CURIAM. The application for stay or vacatur presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICEand by him referred to the Court is granted. The District Court’s July 13, 2020 order granting a preliminary injunction is vacated. The plaintiffs in this case are all federal prisoners who have been sentenced to death for murdering children. The plaintiffs committed their crimes decades ago and have long exhausted all avenues for direct and collateral review. The first of their executions was scheduled to take place this afternoon, with others to follow this week and next month. To carry out these sentences, the Federal Government plans to use a single drug—pentobarbital sodium—that “is widely conceded to be able to render a person fully insensate” and “does not carry the risks” of pain that some have associated with other lethal injection protocols. Zagorski v. Parker, 586 U. S. ___, ___ (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting from denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari) (slip op., at 2). Hours before the first execution was set to take place, the District Court preliminarily enjoined all four executions on the ground that the use of pentobarbital likely constitutes cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. Vacatur of that injunction is appropriate because, among other reasons, the plaintiffs have not established that they are likely to succeed on the merits of their Eighth Amendment claim. That claim faces an exceedingly high bar. “This Court has yet to hold that a State’s method of execution qualifies as cruel and unusual.” Bucklew v. Precythe, 587 U. S. ___, ___ (2019) (slip op., at 12). For good reason—“[f]ar from seeking to superadd terror, pain, or disgrace to their executions, the States have often sought more nearly the opposite,” developing new methods, such as lethal injection, thought to be less painful and more humane than traditional methods, like hanging, that have been uniformly regarded as constitutional for centuries. Ibid. The Federal Government followed this trend by selecting a lethal injection protocol—single-dose pentobarbital—that has become a mainstay of state executions. Pentobarbital: • Has been adopted by five of the small number of States that currently implement the death penalty. • Has been used to carry out over 100 executions, without incident. • Has been repeatedly invoked by prisoners as a less painful and risky alternative to the lethal injection protocols of other jurisdictions. • Was upheld by this Court last year, as applied to a prisoner with a unique medical condition that could only have increased any baseline risk of pain associated with pentobarbital as a general matter. See Bucklew, 587 U. S. ___. • Has been upheld by numerous Courts of Appeals against Eighth Amendment challenges similar to the one presented here. See, e.g., Whitaker v. Collier, 862 F. 3d 490 (CA5 2017); Zink v. Lombardi, 783 F. 3d 1089 (CA8 2015); Gissendaner v. Commissioner, 779 F. 3d 1275 (CA11 2015).

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 5, 2020

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Barr v. Lee

0:00 14:27

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Across The Pond Liberty Stacia Whittecar and Kirstin Clark Welcome to "Across the Pond Liberty," the podcast that paints the New York Liberty's journey in vibrant colours, uniting fans from both sides of the Atlantic. Join hosts Stacia from Kansas and Kirstin from Scotland, as they embark on an exhilarating season-long journey with the Liberty, delivering the latest news, updates, and a shared passion for the team. Meet Your Hosts: 🏀 Stacia: Hailing from Kansas, Stacia's love for the New York Liberty transcends geographical boundaries. With her deep understanding of the game and unwavering support for the team, Stacia is your guide to all things Liberty, both on and off the court. 🏀 Kirstin: Crossing the ocean from Scotland, Kirstin adds an international touch to the podcast. Her genuine passion for the Liberty and her unique perspective from across the pond contribute a fresh outlook that connects fans worldwide. Diving into the Liberty's World: "Across the Pond Liberty" is you The Supreme Court Basketball Podcast Robaire Taylor, Chris Young, Henri Taylor Looking for entertaining basketball content without the drama? Check out The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Join Robaire, Chris, and Henri every Wednesday for the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions. Beyond the Neutral Zone beyondtheneutralzone We are 4 idiots that like to talk about sports but will follow the conversation wherever it leads.Year-round general sports conversation and opinions with a main focus on the NFL. Supreme Court Justices Supme All advertisements are placed at the beginning of each episode, ensuring you experience Supreme Court Justices without interruptions. No mid-episode advertising cuts, no breaks in our judicial coverage. Just press play, and let the Supreme Court analysis unfold uninterrupted. When the gavel strikes and Supreme Court justices take the bench, history unfolds. Supreme Court Justices is where the Supreme Court of America becomes essential conversation, where America Supreme Court decisions shape society, and where every ruling—from latest Supreme Court decisions to historic judgments by first Supreme Court justices—receives the analysis it deserves. This is where Supreme Court of U.S. authority meets constitutional interpretation, where justice on the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of U.S. tradition converge. We explore everything that makes the Supreme Court vital to democracy. From breaking Supreme Court today judgment coverage to analyzing Supreme Court latest

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Supreme Court Opinions?

This episode is 14 minutes long.

When was this Supreme Court Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on August 5, 2020.

Can I download this Supreme Court Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!