Biden’s Drug Pricing March-in Proposal

The Biden administration proposes to expand the march-in framework to include price as a factor in determining that a drug isn’t accessible to the public. March-in rights allow the US government to license to another entity patents covering inventions developed with the help of taxpayer dollars and could apply to a handful of drugs. Dr. Aaron Kesselheim of the Harvard Medical School joins Bloomberg Intelligence Analysts Duane Wright and Tish Walker on this episode of the Votes and Verdicts podcast to discuss why price should be a factor for march-in rights and the implications for federally supported research and development.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jan 18, 2024

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

Biden’s Drug Pricing March-in Proposal

0:00 45:38

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

Dinner Table Politics Bonneville International The Bennett family has been at the heart of Utah politics for over half a century. So what happens when they talk about the issues of the day around the dinner table? Join Jim, the dad, and Abby, the daughter for a free- wheeling political discussion with an intergenerational perspective. College student Abby is a political independent, while her father Jim is a former Republican who became the first candidate of the new United Utah Party in 2017, running for Congress and garnering over 14,000 votes. Jim's father, Bob Bennett, served as a GOP senator from Utah for eighteen years after being unceremoniously ousted by the Tea Party. Bob was well-respected and, toward the end of his life, co-created the Utah Debate Commission, facilitating public discourse between leading candidates. Jim was the first non-Republican/non-Democrat to participate in a UDC debate. Abby may well be the next. The Improvement Association Serial Productions & The New York Times For at least a decade, allegations of cheating have swirled around elections in rural Bladen County, N.C. Some people in town point fingers at a Black advocacy group, the Bladen County Improvement Association, accusing it of bullying voters, tampering with ballots and stealing votes outright. These accusations have never been substantiated, but they persist. To get full access to this show, and to other Serial Productions and New York Times podcasts on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, subscribe at nytimes.com/podcasts.To find out about new shows from Serial Productions, and get a look behind the scenes, sign up for our newsletter at nytimes.com/serialnewsletter.Have a story pitch, a tip, or feedback on our shows? Email us at [email protected] Reporter Zoe Chace went to Bladen County to investigate what’s really going on. From the makers of Serial and The New York Times, a five-part series about allegations of election fraud — and the powerful forces that fuel them.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Votes & Verdicts?

This episode is 45 minutes long.

When was this Votes & Verdicts episode published?

This episode was published on January 18, 2024.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this Votes & Verdicts episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!