Security program on spreadsheets? New regulations piling up and audit tread? It's time for Vanta. Vanta automates security and compliance, brings evidence into one place, and cuts audit prep by 82%.
Less manual work, clear visibility, faster deals, zero chaos. Call it compliance, or call it Com-pliance. Get it? Join the 15,000 companies using Vanta to prove trust.
Go to vanta.com slash comm. Security program on spreadsheets? New regulations piling up and audit tread? It's time for Vanta.
Vanta automates security and compliance, brings evidence into one place, and cuts audit prep by 82%. Less manual work, clear visibility, faster deals, zero chaos. Call it compliance, or call it Com-pliance. Get it?
Join the 15,000 companies using Vanta to prove trust. Go to vanta.com slash comm. Recommendations can be great. Maybe someone recommended this podcast, and here you are.
But home projects are a little different. If the podcast isn't your thing, you might lose a few minutes from your day. But if you hire your cousin's neighbor to mount your TV, you might end up with a lopsided screen and wall damage. I know a guy isn't a good strategy for your home.
That's why Thumbtack works so well. It matches you with top-rated local pros with photos, reviews, and credentials, all in one convenient place. For your next home project, try Thumbtack. Hire the right pro today.
Hi everyone, this is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Kara Swisher. We're off today for the holiday, but we have an episode of On with Kara Swisher for you. Oh, yay.
Yay. Who's on this one? The head of DEI from the National Forestry Service. No, no, no, that's what I say for Pivot.
This is my interview with Bill Gates. You might have heard of him. Oh, my God. In front of a live audience.
I got to be honest, that's impressive. That's impressive. Thank you. I try.
Hi everyone from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. This is On with Kara Swisher, and I'm Kara Swisher. Last week, on a muggy evening in New York City, I visited the legendary Paris Theater on 58th Street to interview the also iconic Bill Gates about his latest Netflix docuseries. It's called What's Next the future with Bill Gates.
It's about some of the biggest issues we face at the moment. AI, disinformation, global health, the wealth gap, and how technology could help or not. It's a funny and substantive series by Morgan Neville who did docs like Won't You Be My Neighbor, about Mr. Rogers, Roadrunner, about Anthony Bourdain, and 20 Feet from Stardom, which garnered him an Oscar.
It's a good match since Neville got Gates to actually use his own experiences as case studies in some of the episodes. It's surprisingly intimate, actually, and I actually really liked it. I didn't think it would be as good as it was, and it really is, especially for people who don't know a lot about these topics. It was also great to be back on stage with Bill, whom I've interviewed many times, including an historic interview with the late Steve Jobs.
While we've had plenty of disagreements over the three decades I've covered Microsoft and also Bill Gates, I took the opportunity to dig a bit deeper and ask him about his interest in investments into many of these areas, including nuclear power, how he would handle attacks on the rich, and the outcome he's hoping for in the upcoming presidential election. Plot spoiler, he implied, referencing climate change deniers, that he's voting for Vice President Kamala Harris, although he certainly didn't make an endorsement. I hope you enjoy it. And by the way, we love that you're listening, and it's even better if you hit subscribe to follow the show to get even more exclusive conversations like this in your feed every Monday and Thursday.
So let's get to it, live from the Paris Theater. Hi, everybody. How you doing? I used to come to this theater as a kid.
It's fantastic to be here, owned by Netflix. Wow, that's something. Anyway, thank you for coming. It's a little lightness here, inequality, AI, climate change, disease.
What else are we talking about? But at least we're not Eric Adams, are we? Okay, I had to do that. Oh, come on.
Anyway, I love New York. Anyway, I'm very excited actually to talk to Bill. I've interviewed him dozens of times over the many years. We first met when he came pouring out of a cab in a very sweaty summer in Washington, D.C.
I thought he had a ride from the limo, but it was some other guy, and he just got out of a D.C. cab and I did an amazing interview with the Washington Post editorial board and came himself and everything else. So that's where we started. I've covered Microsoft for years and talked to him a number of times.
We've agreed not that much, but disagreed a lot. But also, I'm really, I think this phase of his life is really interesting. And he really is an information sponge, curiosity. And he loves to take apart problems.
And I think what he's done with what he's done around disease and other things is really interesting. The last interview we did was about climate change, which is a book that he wrote. And it's actually coming true today. A lot of the stuff he was talking about.
So without further ado, Bill Gates. We meet again. So there's so much to talk about. I think what I'm going to do is I'm going to throw some clips and then talk about them.
We literally have to rush through this stuff because we've only got about 40 minutes to get through all these major topics. And you could do hours on each of these things. But let's start with AI. Let's go to the clip to start with.
And you're talking to James Cameron. In a me as a, hey, innovation can solve everything type person. Right. So thank goodness now I have the AI on my team.
Yes, I'm probably more of a dystopian. I write science fiction. I wrote The Terminator. Where do you and I find common ground around optimism, I think, is the key here.
I would like the message to be balanced between, you know, this longer term concern of infinite capability with the basic needs to have your health care taken care of, to learn, to accelerate climate innovation. You know, is that too nuanced a message to say that AI has these benefits while we have to guard against these other things? I don't think it's too nuanced at all. I think it's exactly the right degree of nuance that we need.
I mean, you're a humanist, right? As long as that humanist principle is first and foremost, as opposed to the drive to dominate market share, the drive to power. If we can make AI the force for good that it has the potential to be great. But how do we introduce caution?
Regulation is part of it, but I think it's also our own ethos and our own value system. So that's a perfect person, the creator of The Terminator, which I think has informed a lot of people about AI, the idea that it's here to kill us, essentially. And, you know, the first person I talked about AI with was Elon Musk, actually, who was quite worried about it at the time. He thought it was here to kill us.
Later, he evolved it into us treating us like house cats. And then he said we were like anthills, that the highway will come through and just cover us, et cetera. Always a happy day with Elon Musk. But when I was watching this, I watched it again on a train up here.
It's advanced quicker than anyone, including yourself, had thought, right? That it's moved quicker. And you talk about this. And it's a very good explainer in the film.
But I want you to sort of unpack why you're still very sunny about it, I would say. And I think you lean towards the possibilities. So talk a little bit about that. Well, the idea that computers would eventually become intelligent and do human like things, you know, as soon as you learn how to program, you're thinking, wow, what can't software do and why not?
And so prosaic things like visual recognition, speech recognition seemed out of reach. You know, I was age 15 when I saw this Stanford SRI shaky the robot video. And I thought, wow, we are getting close. Look at that.
Shaky almost can do these things. So it has been mostly disappointing when the neural nets came in. Then the prosaic stuff, the speech and video got strong. But even then, the idea of representing knowledge, being able to read and write, still seemed out of reach.
And I believe that we'd have to explicitly understand how to represent knowledge. I didn't think that pure reinforcement would cause this great knowledge representation to emerge. And even GPT-3, you know, I was like, it's still statistical. It's not really a word model.
And so it's going to be deeply flawed. But by GPT-4, that was wrong. And so, you know, right up there with my first demo of graphics interface with Charles Simonyi, I'd say, you know, that demo of ChatGPT4 was the most amazing demo I've ever seen. I think a lot of people attribute the huge amount of information we've been putting into the internet right now as the leaping point.
What do you, because I was at a dinner with a very, a very smart group of technologists, and they didn't know. So talk about not knowing, because, you know, software is about knowing how you put something in, you take something out. What is, what do you attribute the leap to recently? Well to giant companies that are going to dominate this area.
OpenAI is raising money at $150 billion valuation. There's some sort of kerfuffle going on among all the executives, but it's turning into a for-profit corporation. It started as a nonprofit to help humanity. Now it's going to help humans, a few humans, a few select humans.
Microsoft now has vaulted ahead with this investment in OpenAI and everything else. If there's a few corporations running this, I would worry about that. Would you? Well, in general, we have this thing called competition, and the main thing you want is that it's so competitive that the improvements go to benefit the user.
That is, the quality of medical diagnosis improves the health system. The availability of that personal tutor that, and I was out in Newark seeing a few months ago, that, you know, that becomes super cheap for kids in the inner city, not just wealthy kids. And I've never seen such intense competition. You know, it's the same way as the Internet in 2000, 2001.
The failure rate will be unbelievable because they're sort of a, oh, it's an AI thing, give it a high valuation. So consumers will be the primary beneficiaries. Now, if you ever get to the point where one company is not the other company, then fine, the competition authorities can come in. But we're in no, you know, we're not even close to that.
You know, Google is still extremely capable in this space, OpenAI plus Microsoft, but, you know, there's, you know, Elon's got XAI, you've got Anthropic, you know, at least it can become 15 companies that aren't that far from the state of the art who are lowering prices. You know, they're investing way above the revenue level. And so this is the formula for the benefits to flow to society. Okay, we're going to rush this, but what's very quickly your biggest worry, a real worry, and your biggest benefit right now?
Well, the biggest benefit is that I think this technology, and this is my primary engagement with it, we can get it to the inner city. We can get it to Africa within the same time frame that it gets to the wealthy. Unlike any other technology in history, this one, I think we can get it out on an equity basis. Your worry?
My worry is just that this is the most unbounded thing. This is not just a tractor, you know, obsoleting farmers, where you say, okay, it turns out there are many other unmet needs there. This, you know, which we thought would first come for blue-collar work through robots. You know, the surprise was that with this language facility, it's actually coming first for white-collar jobs, but the blue-collar thing is happening just a little bit later.
You know, certainly within the next three, four, five years. And so it's so disruptive at a time where government, who you expect to take the excess productivity, and, you know, spread it around in a fair way, reduce the work week, our general trust in the capacity of government to do complex things is pretty low. Yeah, I thought so. It was a good run, guys.
So congratulations. All right, let's roll the next clip, which is an area I really spend a lot of time. Do you find yourself, even at this age, using your phone and staying on social media more than you want to? Oh my gosh, yeah.
TikTok is so addictive. I'm on it, like, all the time. And have you ever run into crazy misinformation about memes? Crazy misinformation about you all the time.
I've even had friends cut me off because of these vaccine rumors, but I'm a public health student at Stanford, and I think that there is just so much nuance on how do you communicate, like, accurate public health information or scientific data. I don't know. I need to learn more because I naively still believe that digital communication can be a force to bring us together to have a reasonable debate. I think one thing, like, you don't really understand about online is, like, it's not really, like, logic and fact that win out.
Like, people want an escape. They want to, like, laugh. They want an engaging video. They want to, you know, be taken away from boring reality.
And so, like, the most popular video of you online is you literally trying to do the dab. Bill, can you do the dab real quick? Can Bill! Or you jumping over the chair.
Is it true that you can leap over a chair from a standing position? It depends on the size of the chair, but I'll cheat a little bit. Yeah! Those are the most popular because people want to escape from things.
So I don't think fact and reason always win out online. But the thing about, you know, I make lots of money from vaccines, it's even hard for me to figure out where that comes from. It's not like a political organization. It's just madness.
And who promotes that? I think it's fear. I mean, everyone was stuck at home during a pandemic. We're all scared for our lives.
No one really knows what to trust or what to believe. So that's what our society does. Okay. So can you do the chair right now?
No. A smaller one. Yeah. A little stool.
I think it was a stool. Your daughter's very wise. But most of the stuff about you isn't funny, actually. I spend a lot of time telling people you're not Satan about that.
You don't put chips in people's brains. I spend an inordinate amount of time doing that, which is an unusual position for me to be in. But let's talk a little bit about misinformation. You talk about Anthony Fauci, who has had death threats.
I just interviewed him recently. One of the reasons government is in the trouble it's in is the polarization, which is fueled by online stuff. And there's no question about it. I know they're trying to come up with studies.
It's not true, but a new study just came out showing it is absolutely true. The polarization has been further impacted, especially around – we use the word misinformation, disinformation, but it's really propaganda, isn't it? That's really what's happening. 1.2 billion views were of Elon doing misinformation on the platform he bought, which he enjoys spewing misinformation on.
It's actually the biggest purveyor of misinformation right now. Can you talk a little bit about this and the worries you have? Because it does directly impact you yourself, which I'm not worried about you, but everybody here in this room. Well, I didn't anticipate that if you want to belong to a group, there almost becomes certain beliefs.
You know, the election was stolen. You know, vaccines have negative effects. You know, Fauci is a self-interested individual who somehow gets royalties from vaccines. I mean, you know, totally false, provably wrong.
I want to track the position of people. I don't know why I do, but it's amazing. Because you're Satan, but go ahead. Even Satan doesn't need to know where people are.
What does he do with it? So, that's – it's just strange. And, you know, we always try to deal with it with humor. And as you say, I have nothing overall to complain about.
But the idea that your sort of group beliefs are reinforced online. And so you have developed a reality that when people say, no, the election was not stolen, you're like, no, that would be almost denying that I'm part of this group. And so I'm going to behave that way. It's incredibly scary because it's definitely putting us into separate camps.
And it's hard to see. People say, oh, we didn't regulate social media properly. Well, do we know now? You know, are we regulating it today?
Is there a clear understanding of it? And then, of course, AI that we just discussed at anything supercharges this ability to create credible misinformation. What would you do now to stop this? Because I think people are in their own separate.
Microsoft is an early investor in Facebook when it was a $15 billion valuation. Nice one. That was a good one. I doubted that.
I'm sorry. I was wrong. But when you think about what should be done now, because if people are in their own information bubbles in a way that's profound and an AI, for example, can supercharge it, as you say, what would be the solutions to avoiding that? Well, most things where, you know, the country has been off track or the world's been off track, you start to see the harms and then, you know, people self-correct, you know, parents play a role, educators play a role, and some degree of banning the extreme behavior plays a role.
But, you know, first we have to come to a view that, okay, this really is a problem. The United States may not be the first place to get this under control. We have the First Amendment and, you know, our divisiveness is particularly high. I wish I could say, okay, such and such a country has done this extremely well.
You know, the country that actually controls craziness on the Internet is China, but they do it in a way that destroys. They do like to track everybody where they're going. Yeah, and they don't let crazy things out there. They do better, but at the loss of democratic freedoms.
So what do you do in a situation when, say, you have someone like Elon, who has suddenly decided to let misinformation flow, toxic waste all over the place? And in some cases, people who try harder, like a Mark Zuckerberg, who you were a mentor to him, he and I had a big argument about Holocaust deniers a couple of years ago, and I kept saying this is going to lead to anti-Semitism down the line. And he said, well, we're odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O.com.
Okay, next one. Let's go to the next one. We're moving on very quickly into climate change. Another happy topic.
If you think of our addiction to fossil fuels and the way that we're going about attempting to wean off of it, we're losing. The fossil fuel industry is making record profits. Emissions are going up. People are right to be incredibly skeptical and disillusioned.
There's part of a movement that I don't fully agree with, which is that you denigrate the current way of doing things before we have a replacement. I wish there was as much emphasis on the new thing, but I'm an optimist, and I think we will limit temperature increase. So this is something you spent a lot of time on. That's what our last interview was about.
You seemed worried at the time of where it's going. The temperature increase is obviously, we have another hurricane in Florida, and yet legislators are pretending climate change doesn't exist. Talk a little bit about where we are right now. And one thing that you talked about a lot, which I've been spending a lot of time studying, is nuclear energy.
Microsoft just recently is possibly going to open Three Mile Island, which I'm like, AI, Three Mile Island. Great. Seems like it could go well. But actually, it could.
It could actually go well in order to compute power for AI. Talk a little bit about where we are right now, because it's really, it seems to be accelerating and young people are very worried. Again, another bag of crap we've handed them in this regard. Well, the key to solving climate change, you know, I wrote a book with a theory of change that has to do with replacing all emitting activities for goods and services with new approaches that are green, that have no emissions.
Today, those green approaches are extremely expensive. Green cement, green aviation fuel. You talk about the green premium. And only by funding innovation, having some degree of tax credits and buyers willing to pay extra, then as you scale up, those costs come down and you get the magic that says you can even go to a middling country like India and say, okay, here's a way to make cement.
It does not cost more. And so in 2015, when the Paris Accord is signed, I commit to create Breakthrough Energy. I'm there with country leaders, Modi, Obama, and they commit to double energy R&D budgets, which they, to a small degree, they didn't, didn't get to that doubling. But now Breakthrough Energy and other investors are funding unbelievable innovation, new ways to make steel, cement, meat, you name it.
And although those won't roll out in time on a global basis to hit a two degree target, they will roll out and they'll avoid us getting to extreme warming. The sad thing about climate change right now is people, given how much we'll be able to limit it, they overestimate the impact of climate change on rich countries. You know, rich countries have air conditioning. We can change our crops.
We have savings. The big losses are near the equator where you have poor people who depend on agriculture. And when you've heard agriculture, you cause malnutrition, which causes a lot more death. And so the picture and of the suffering and the need for climate adaptation should lead to us being more generous to these countries at a time where, because of other things, we are actually being significantly less generous to the poor countries.
So one thing you talk about is as nuclear is the solution, correct? Absolutely. Nuclear fission and or fusion will be very, very important, along with renewable sources. You said renewables aren't enough.
And the renewable alone is not enough because of the intermittency. You know, Japan will not be powered by renewable energy. South Korea won't be powered by renewable energy when you have a cold snap and that cold front is sitting there. No wind, no solar.
People still want their houses not to be sub-zero. Right. So talk a little bit because there's a bunch of people, including Sam Altman of OpenAI, working on nuclear at Helion. They're talking.
I just was with someone who was talking about how you're gonna have a small nuclear device in your house to heat it. Everyone's gonna have a small nuclear device. I'm just telling you, I have to sit and listen. You don't have to listen to these people.
But how do you look? How does that roll out, given the reputation? I mean, I know it's laughable, but Three Mile Island, you're like, maybe not. But at the same time, maybe.
So how do you make that work? How is Microsoft going to make that argument? Well, you know, coal kills people when it's mined. It kills people from local pollution after gas pipelines blow up.
I'm not involved in third generation nuclear, which is what resuscitating that plant is. I am a large funder of a fourth generation nuclear, which is a plant with no high pressure in it. Very different design that everybody, just like, you know, they said you should recover rocket stages to make space flight cheap. They've always said you should use metal cooling because all these safety issues of what happens when you shut the reactor down are completely solved.
It's a very simple design. And we should be able to do it for about a third of the cost of current reactors. So, you know, we're pursuing that dream. Everything about nuclear fission and fusion, people have a great deal of skepticism of will it be cheap enough and what will the safety look like?
But, you know, I'm putting billions into it because I'm quite confident we can make that case. So what do you say to young people like this who we still are dependent on fossil fuels? Well, the banning fossil fuels before you have a substitute is a way of getting governments elected who don't think climate change exists. You know, if you just say, no, you can't drive to work.
I mean, so we why? Why did they go to universities and say, don't invest in the existing? Why don't they go and say, please take your money and invest in these new approaches? Because if you take your money away from the existing stuff, that doesn't create a solution.
You know, when I was at 2015 in the climate conference, I'm like, you guys are making a bunch of pledges. What's your plan for steel? There were zero startups about making steel in a new way. 6% emissions.
Cement, also 6%. No work going on. So if you want to outcompete the dirty stuff, you actually have to get the entrepreneurs. You have to inspire them.
You have to have high risk capital. And so a lot of the things I love the activists because the issue is a huge issue and they deserve all the credit for keeping it there. But when they say the solution is to stop consuming, you know, that means that can India build basic shelter. So we're not going to stop using cement, a lot of cement.
Even if rich countries didn't build another building ever, it's a rounding error. This is a middle income country problem of providing basic lifestyle level goods and services. And so it's an invention problem. Now I say that about everything, but in this case, it's, it's correct.
All right. Is there anything really unusual you've invested in? And then we're gonna move on to the next one. Well, There's so many cool things.
We have 130 companies that breakthrough energy has funded. You know, we have new ways of making food. We have ways of making cows not emit natural gas. The idea that there's hydrogen that you can dig geological hydrogen, that might surprise people.
And that's, you know, that's going to be a huge help to solve this. Yeah. I'm going in a hydrogen powered plane soon. You want to come?
Wow. Yeah. You want to come? I what's the anyway?
Yes. I'm funding a lot of that stuff. I hope it works. Yeah.
Each one of my four children are like, no. And I said, yes, I'm getting on it. Anyway, let's go to the next thing. Are people too rich?
Speaking of that. All right. Under the tax system I would go for, the wealthy would have, say, a third as much. Well, I think that's the thing I would go a lot further.
And I think, you know, your friend Warren Buffett makes the point that his effective tax rate is lower than his secretary's. And that is not what the American people want to see. They do want to see the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes. But you have a political system which unfortunately represents the needs of the wealthy, much more than the needs of ordinary Americans.
You know, they do these happiness questionnaires. Have you seen that? You know. Oh, yeah.
What they find is countries where people have that economic security, as in Scandinavia, usually Denmark or Finland or somebody, ranks at the very top. Why is that? I think it's because people don't have to deal with the stress about how they're gonna feed their kids and provide health care or childcare. If you take that level of economic stress, if I say to somebody, you're never gonna have to worry about whether you're gonna feed your family, whether your kids are gonna have health care.
Thank you. Is it gonna make their life perfect? No. Will it ease their stress level, bring more happiness, security?
I think it will. Well, kudos to you to talk to Bernie. I remember when we had Elizabeth Warren, I think one of the years you're a code, everybody, all the men in the audience, you could feel them seize up when she was talking about these kinds of things of the rich paying more taxes. Kamala Harris, Vice President Harris talked about it last night in an interview.
Fair share, nothing against capitalism, but everything's out of whack. And actually, corporate tax rates are What you're talking about is the idea that the middle class feels very squeezed. This is the topic in this election. Trump wants to give more tax breaks to the wealthy.
Kamala Harris is talking about giving tax breaks to the middle class. Where do you think... what would you... if you were running for president, what would be your stand on this?
Well, I wouldn't get elected. I would bring up the deficit and say that, yes, we can tax the rich a lot more. But even so, you know, the 2017 tax, a lot of that's going to have to expire because the deficits will lead to a level of inflation that voters will not be happy with. There's a huge leg in this, but nobody talks about the deficit.
I would raise the safety net somewhat, but I would also, for future generations, reduce the deficit quite a bit. So 62 percent, you would keep 62 percent. We can have the rest. 38.
We can have 38. You would keep 38 and we can have the rest. If you had the tax system I have in mind, if that had been in place throughout my entire life, I would have about 38 percent of what I have. All right, we'll take it.
All right, last one. Episode 5. Can we outsmart diseases? Your biggest topic.
When you sit in those wards, you know, you just see how frantic things are because the wards are never adequately staffed because malaria is quite seasonal. It's as the rainy season comes and the mosquito population grows exponentially. As a kid, I can't even tell you how many episodes of malaria I went through. I can still clearly see, you know, the picture of my father.
He was standing next to my bed, looking at me. I could really see, you know, a lot of fear in the eyes. If malaria was killing 600,000 people in the U.S. or in Europe, the problem would have completely changed by now.
So malaria was one of the areas you focused on most strongly. Talk about where it is right now. I remember you let mosquitoes out at TED, if I recall, which you're not going to do here. But where is it right now from your perspective in these worldwide diseases?
It's still, you know, it's not neglected anymore because of you and the Gates Foundation. But where is that? And what are the diseases you're looking at? Yeah, so malaria at the turn of the century, when the Gates Foundation is created, is killing a bit over a million a year.
And over the first 15 years of this century, we got it down to about a half million. And it's gone up slightly from there, but you say a half million a year. You know, this is a disease that there's almost no funding because the disease is in the poor countries who don't have the resources. And the rich countries just aren't involved.
They don't see it as a problem. We do have in the pipeline some incredible tools. So that gentleman you met there, Diaboli, is a scientist in Burkina Faso who has tools to kill mosquitoes. And, you know, we're going through a lot of experiments based on his work and others.
And within three to five years, this tool will be ready for release. And so if we get a surge in funding, then we could start the effort to eradicate malaria. By killing mosquitoes. Yeah, so what you have to do is get rid of 90 percent of the mosquito population.
And so the reinfection rate, you slow it down enough that you can test and treat. And if you go through a bunch of low seasons where you've done that, this is what happened in the U.S. We had a lot of malaria, but at the time you could spray DDT on the ponds. And that decimated mosquito populations.
And so because of winters, low seasons, we actually got this zero. We're trying to create the equivalent in places like Nigeria where, you know, as a child, you have a one in six chance of dying before the age of five. So when you think about this, it continues to be the most important disease you're fighting right now, malaria. Or are there others that you're...
It's, you know, it's hard to rate. TB kills the most people of any disease. Malnutrition is the one thing if I had a wand, I would get rid of because if you're not malnourished, you're less than half as likely to die even if you get malaria, diarrhea, or pneumonia. And it cripples you for life because you can never catch up if your brain doesn't develop when you're young.
You know, sickle cell disease is this evil disease. We have a $2 million cure, but the Foundation is working to make it a $200 cure. And that means we could take it to Africa where we have millions of kids with sickle cell versus 60,000 in the U.S. And every one is a tragedy.
So those are the ones you're focused on because another one in this country, at least, is heart disease and obesity, of course, which is sort of the opposite. That's right. We live to a very old age. We'll be back in a minute.
Sometimes the bubbles in an Aero Truffle piece can take 34 seconds to melt in your mouth. Sometimes the very amount you're stuck at the same red light. Rich, creamy, chocolatey Aero Truffle. Feel the Aero bubbles melt.
It's mind-bubbling. Square Note and Hospitality. Efficiency is everything. That's why their system lets you take payments, track sales, handle inventory, manage staff, send invoices, and keep up with finances all in one place.
Fight through orders with zero mistakes. Get the data you need and keep everything working together so you're ready for whatever's next. Learn more about their customizable plans at squareup.com. This episode is brought to you by Telus Online Security.
Ugh, tax season is the worst. You mean hack season? Sorry, what? Yeah, cybercriminals love tax forms.
But I've got Telus Online Security. It helps protect against identity theft and financial fraud so I can stress less during tax season or any season. Plans start at just $12 a month. Learn more at telus.com slash online security.
No one can prevent all cybercrime or identity theft. Conditions apply. So when you think about, we've got to go in a second, but when you think about how you outsmart disease, you've been at this for what? It's not 20 years, right?
Yeah, no, the foundation is created and becomes the largest at the turn of the century. So what are you most focused on as you move into the new phase of what you're doing? Still malaria and TBE and these diseases. Health broadly.
You know, we work in agriculture because that we can, you know, make eggs and milk really cheap. We can have crops that deal with climate change. So a lot of that is climate adaptation related. But global health, you know, all of the resources I have will go to these global health issues.
And we ought to be able to achieve in my lifetime. We're almost done with polio. We should be able to get rid of measles, malaria, almost all of malnutrition. So, you know, it's actually very exciting work.
It's very hopeful. You know, we've come a long ways from 10 million a year dying to now 5 million. But to get down to that one percent, we have to cut it in half three more times. So what's next for what's next?
What are you going? Space travel? Are you going to Mars with Elon? Nope.
What are you going to do more of these? You know, I think we'll go three, four or five years and see. Well, what interests you? These are big topics, but is there again, space travel is one cloning?
Well, genetic editing and being taken with about how we use that. You know, my focus on that to cure sickle cell at a very low cost or to cure HIV at a very low cost. So it's about the diseases that make the world incredibly inequitable. All right.
Last question. Are you hopeful or, you know, it's pretty, it's pretty tense right now. It's still, and it's been tense for a couple of years out of COVID. We're still sort of not recovered from that.
And a lot of people aren't. How do you, what is your mood right now? Well, you know, ask me on November 6th whether climate change is real or not. So I'm guessing who you're voting for, but I, you can definitely guess, but where my energy is going.
Overall, I'm still an optimist. I mean, if you zoom out and say, okay, where were we, you know, 50 years ago, a hundred years ago, you know, humans are ingenious at doing things. I hope that the younger generation can look at polarization, look at the negative effects of digital, including misinformation, but not only misinformation, and shaping AI so that its miraculous capability in health and education isn't canceled out by disorder and a lack of purpose. So we've left some real challenges for this next generation, but, you know, I'm overall very hopeful.
I get to see more innovation in other people, so I understand why I would be more hopeful. There's a lot, whether it's climate or health, that is very, very exciting. Great. Well, I have to say, it's a, it's very good.
You're pretty good at interviewing. I mean, I'm not going to lose my day job, but nonetheless, you did a nice job. Anyway, thank you so much. And thank you, Bill Gates.
Great. Thank you. On with Kara Swisher is produced by Christian Castro Roussel, Kateria Yochum, Joey Myers, and Megan Bernie. Special thanks to Kate Gallagher, Caitlin Lynch, and Claire Hyman.
Our engineers