BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 7, 2025 · 24 MIN

BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman

from Supreme Court Opinions · host SCOTUS Opinions

In this case, the court considered this issue: Does Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)’s stringent standard apply to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended complaint?The case was decided on June 5, 2025.The Supreme Court held that Relief under Rule 60(b)(6) requires extraordinary circumstances, and this standard does not become less demanding when the movant seeks to reopen a case to amend a complaint. A party must first satisfy Rule 60(b) before Rule 15(a)’s liberal amendment standard can apply.The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you. 

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 7, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman

0:00 24:29

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Supreme Court Opinions?

This episode is 24 minutes long.

When was this Supreme Court Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on June 7, 2025.

Can I download this Supreme Court Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!