BONUS EP: Custodial Evaluators

BONUS EP: Custodial EvaluatorsIn this bonus episode of the JudgMental Podcast, Christine and Hugh dive into the latest developments in Louisville, Kentucky’s family court system—specifically, the controversy surrounding custodial evaluations. They discuss recent motions to disqualify commonly used evaluators, the issues of confirmation bias, testing fatigue, and the problematic “team approach” to psychological testing.The hosts break down the findings from a Florida expert’s report, including concerns about the use of certain psychological tests, the misuse of “forensic” terminology, and the troubling confidentiality practices that leave families in the dark. They also explore the broader implications for families caught in the system, the delays and high costs of evaluations, and the impact on children and parents.Listeners will hear real stories from the community, learn about similar cases in California, and get practical advice on what to look for in billing and evaluation reports. Christine invites anyone with experiences involving evaluators Marvin, McCreary, or Burley to share their stories and bills for further investigation.Key topics:Motions to disqualify evaluators in LouisvilleConfirmation bias and testing issues in custodial evaluationsThe “team approach” and lack of transparencyConfidentiality concerns and public record implicationsDelays, costs, and the impact on familiesNational patterns and high-profile casesHow to submit your own stories and reportsConnect with us:Website: judge-y.comChristine: @Kentuckychristine (all platforms)Podcast: Judge-y (YouTube, Instagram, TikTok)Tune in for a candid, eye-opening discussion on the realities of family court evaluations and what needs to change.