Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 11, 2026 · 16 MIN

Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections

from So Ordered · host So Ordered

The Court holds that a political candidate has Article III standing to challenge the rules that govern the counting of votes in his election. Congressman Michael Bost may therefore pursue his suit against Illinois's practice of counting mail-in ballots received up to two weeks after Election Day — without having to show that the rule risks costing him the election, a significant vote threshold, or money. CASE: Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections AUTHOR: Roberts, J. DECIDED: 2026-01-14 OPINION: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/607us1r05_e2q3.pdf AI DISCLOSURE: The voices in this podcast are AI-generated. The narration is produced by a machine-learning voice synthesis model. Tone, inflection, pacing, and emphasis are artifacts of the model and should not be attributed to any individual. The text being read is the majority opinion as published by the Supreme Court of the United States with light adaptations to improve readability.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 11, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections

0:00 16:52

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of So Ordered?

This episode is 16 minutes long.

When was this So Ordered episode published?

This episode was published on June 11, 2026.

Can I download this So Ordered episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!