Bring Science to the Reviewing of Science: Evidence-Based Standards for Peer Review episode artwork

EPISODE · Sep 22, 2024 · 1H 4M

Bring Science to the Reviewing of Science: Evidence-Based Standards for Peer Review

from Scholarly Communication · host New Books Network

Listen to this interview of Paul Ralph, Professor, Dalhousie University, Canada. We talk about what's wrong with peer review — and how to fix it! Paul Ralph : "We don't want reviewers micromanaging style, complaining about the way the study is written. No, what we want — and need — is for reviewers to focus on the methodological details of the study: Was it done well? Are the results likely to be true?" For more, see Empirical Standards. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Sep 22, 2024

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Bring Science to the Reviewing of Science: Evidence-Based Standards for Peer Review

0:00 1:04:05

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Scholarly Communication?

This episode is 1 hour and 4 minutes long.

When was this Scholarly Communication episode published?

This episode was published on September 22, 2024.

Can I download this Scholarly Communication episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!