Camping Outside the Supreme Court episode artwork

EPISODE · May 3, 2021 · 1H 4M

Camping Outside the Supreme Court

from Advisory Opinions · host The Dispatch

Today’s episode is the jackpot for Supreme Court bingo players, as our hosts play a guessing game as to which justices will write some of the court’s most anticipated forthcoming opinions. Also on today’s episode, David and Sarah chat about two cases involving racial classification in the dispensation of government relief to “socially disadvantaged” farmers and ranchers, and debate which Supreme Court cases AP U.S. history students should be required to commit to memory. Plus, Sarah shares a fun story about her experience camping outside of the Supreme Court building to hear oral arguments for D.C. v. Heller. Show Notes: -Fulton v. City of Philadelphia -Ferris v. United States -Trump v. Hawaii Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 3, 2021

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Camping Outside the Supreme Court

0:00 1:04:43

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Advisory Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 4 minutes long.

When was this Advisory Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on May 3, 2021.

Can I download this Advisory Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!