Can AI Make Lawyers Better? Daniel Schwarcz on AI and Human Legal Reasoning episode artwork

EPISODE · May 12, 2026 · 33 MIN

Can AI Make Lawyers Better? Daniel Schwarcz on AI and Human Legal Reasoning

from AI and the Future of Law

Can AI help lawyers learn—or does it weaken the skills legal training is meant to build?In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by Daniel Schwarcz, Fredrikson & Byron Professor of Law at the University of Minnesota Law School, to discuss new empirical research on artificial intelligence and human legal reasoning. Daniel explains a randomized control trial studying how law students used AI to synthesize legal materials, apply legal rules, and revise legal analysis—and why some results surprised even the researchers.In this episode:Why legal training may prepare lawyers to use AI wellWhat the University of Minnesota study tested about AI and legal reasoningWhy AI-assisted students performed better than expectedThe risks of using AI for revision under time pressureWhat law schools and law firms should take away from the research Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 12, 2026

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Can AI Make Lawyers Better? Daniel Schwarcz on AI and Human Legal Reasoning

0:00 33:28

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of AI and the Future of Law?

This episode is 33 minutes long.

When was this AI and the Future of Law episode published?

This episode was published on May 12, 2026.

Can I download this AI and the Future of Law episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!