Capecitabine Versus Continuous Infusion 5-FU for Rectal Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Equivalent Effectiveness Raises Real-World Questions About Efficacy, Adherence and Economic Implications episode artwork

EPISODE · May 5, 2014 · 13 MIN

Capecitabine Versus Continuous Infusion 5-FU for Rectal Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Equivalent Effectiveness Raises Real-World Questions About Efficacy, Adherence and Economic Implications

from Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) Podcast

This trial supports the use of neoadjuvant capecitabine monotherapy as a potentially more convenient radiosensitizer that does not sacrifice surgical and pathologic outcomes in rectal cancer. However, further study is needed.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 5, 2014

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Capecitabine Versus Continuous Infusion 5-FU for Rectal Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Equivalent Effectiveness Raises Real-World Questions About Efficacy, Adherence and Economic Implications

0:00 13:12

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) Podcast?

This episode is 13 minutes long.

When was this Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on May 5, 2014.

Can I download this Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!