Even Trump, in his own country, where he knows the Republicans get slaughtered in November. So he's trying to lay the groundwork to have something like that, because what they do know, what scares me, is they can't have a free and fair election. That is a disaster for them. It's a lot on every level.
They know that. They're going to do everything they can to stop it. It's just literally, that's where we are. And expect the worst.
Expect the worst. I'm Terry Wall-Weiss with the Daily Beast podcast, filling in for Joanna Coles. Today, our guest is James Carville, the legendary political strategist and consultant. He is going to make some bold predictions about the midterms, dig into Trump's record low approval, and tell us who comes out on top as Americans see these never-ending airport lines.
But before we dig into the show, please take a moment to share this podcast with your friends, invite them to subscribe to the Daily Beast's YouTube channel. We've thankfully reached 500,000 followers, and we're gunning for one million with your help. So here's our show with James Carville. So just going to jump right in here.
I mean, Democrats this week flipped Trump's Mar-a-Lago district by double digits. It was a state special election, but what does this say to you about where we're headed with the midterms? No, this is interesting. This has happened ever since Trump has been elected in November of 2024.
It's consistent 12 to 14.4 performance. And it's an irrespective of a job. It doesn't matter if it's Florida, it doesn't matter if it's Pennsylvania, it doesn't matter if it's California, it doesn't matter if it's Mississippi. Senate seat that flipped, which is actually more important because the vacancy was when the governor picked the then state senator to be the senator governor.
Now, you've been around politics long enough to know they're only going to pick somebody from the state seat because they don't want to lose the seat in the state senate. But they lost it, which was a giant blow internally to Ron DeSantis. He's not going to be governor after this year anyway. So what we're seeing is double-digit overperformance everywhere.
And Mar-a-Lago is no different than any other place. It just happens to be where the votes, but it's not as consistent with any other place. I mean, we're talking about usually saying a competitive race is a two- to three-point race. Are you expecting that places where there was a double-digit win by Republican in 2024, those are now considered competitive looking at November?
Well, I think the best way to look at November is if you just take election returns and you take the poll and the aggregate, I mean, you know, everybody has their favorite poll aggregator, but they're also about the same. The question is, is the over-under for Democratic Senate seats, I think it's 55. I'm not really believe that. If you're running 10, 11 points consistently ahead of 2024 performance, you're looking at a lot.
I mean, once you start going north or five, things start to fall. And every piece of evidence we have thus far indicates that that's what's happening. Now, can you come back and say, well, you said this in late March, and here we are, and I'm told we're saying something different? Yeah, because when the facts change, I'm going to change the mind.
But right now, I'm over-under for Senate seats to 55. I would be semi-disappointed if it was 53 Democratic seats. So your prediction right now is Democrats will take both the House and the Senate at this stage? Not just take, I mean, I'm talking about eight Senate seats or something like that.
But if you look at it, where we are at this moment, I don't know how a person could honestly draw another conclusion. The conclusion would be, well, once people's partisanship starts to kick in and the Trump people see what's at stake, that's fine and dandy. But right now, all of the evidence would point to 55 of our Senate seats or Democrats. I'm curious when it comes to Trump, he did endorse any state special elections, his candidates specifically in his own district loss.
When it comes to the Trump endorsement, is that a good thing for Republicans when we look ahead to the general election? He has a lot of power in the primary, but what does that mean to you in the general? Of course it doesn't help in the general at all. Of course you want to run against Trump in Texas.
Remember, Trump is 12 points under one in Texas. Okay? Just let him endorse it. Now he's scared to endorse it.
Primaries in, you know, what if you talk to the Republican Senate of Congress and say, look, I got to get through the primary. If I get through that, I'll worry about the general. But I mean, the idea is to fight to live another day. But I think increasingly, you're starting to see Nancy Mace, who's in a tight primary for government, saying, I'm not for troops on the ground.
I'll walk out of this. And you're starting to see Mike Rogers, who's a Republican from Alabama, saying the deal committed I do want to talk about the war in Iran shortly. But before I go there, I do want to say, Democrats, they would want Trump on the campaign trail at this stage. That's a good thing for them, you think?
Oh, yes. I mean, in a place where you could actually help the Republicans, we're not going to win that anyway. Maybe you can still help in West Virginia, Tennessee, and maybe I'm not even, I think it's a lot closer, probably people think, probably all can start to Idaho, Wyoming. But once you get past those, you're in thin territory.
Or if you look at all the safe rates underwater, it's very few that he's, the proof is hard in this group. And it'll probably get worse. Yeah, it's interesting because he promised he would endorse in that Texas Senate race he brought up, but he has since not endorsed. He said he would do it soon.
Obviously, Ken Paxton was hedging and wasn't saying he would drop out if he endorsed Senator Cornyn. But do you expect these to be ongoing challenges? I mean, that won't happen until May, but it's looking uglier and uglier for Republicans just to get through this primary cycle. Well, Ken Paxton made one brilliant political move.
He said, if the Senate passes the SAVE Act, I'll drop out. So now Trump can't. I mean, that was like, I don't know, the chess player, but that was a brilliant move. There's a British player as a double finesse, right?
He said, okay, I'll get out if you pay. And of course, Dooms, who's put $77 billion in Colin's campaign, he has more to do it because he knows that 55 Democratic senators are coming. So he's trying to, and this caucus knows that. I mean, these people have, they think beyond the next minute, and they're not going to break a filibuster for him, and then PACs and can tell Trump, you're going to get a gun for it, y'all would.
It's literally that simple. Curious about what your thoughts are on President Trump this week. He voted in the special election in Florida by mail. He's doing it while he is attacking vote by mail.
Part of the Save America Act that he mentions is this whole thing about the elections being rigged, his ongoing spiel. Literally, just this week, he called it cheating, and then he went and used it himself in the special election. What do you make of that? It's what we've known about Donald Trump since his birth on the scene.
He's a massive and blatant hypocrite, and the fact that he's engaged in hypocrisy is the ultimate adult vice man story. If he ever did something that was not hypocritical, you would say, wow, this is something different, but he does it every election. It's the same thing over and over. And of course, what you and I know is there's very little voter fraud in the United States.
You can't say there's none, but it's almost, it's hard to find. You've got to look really hard to go up with it. And he is going to do everything he can to shed people's confidence in the election, so he can say, I'm not prepared to do it, but he's going to try something to mess with the election. What it is, I don't know, but we need to be prepared at all costs.
I am curious about that. I mean, how do you think Democrats should combat the threats of the president to undermine the upcoming election when he talks about cheating and the election being rigged? What should they be doing at this stage to combat some of that come November? Look, one of the things that I think is that you have all these voter suppression laws in the past.
He doesn't want you to have the election. In other words, if I were Democrats, I'd say that's all the more reason for you to go out and vote. They're trying to make it harder. They think you won't vote if we make a line five minutes longer.
You show them. You're going to vote. People showing up and casting your vote, and the people in your county or your parish or your township or whatever the minister of the election, you know they can count, and show them and go up and vote. I would make it as voting as, if you will, an act of defiance.
That always rallies people. That could be a point where they push back, if you will, the rallying cry. Right. If I tell the thing that will make you want to do something more than anything else, if I tell you, you can't do that, you're going to be fooled, you're not the boss of me.
That's going to make me want to do it more. So somebody says, don't read this book, because it's a dirty book, and you're going to go out and buy a book and read a book, because they're telling you not to read it. So all of human nature is people, particularly Americans, rebel against being told what to do. Now, the Democrats are traditionally like, no, HPEs, government is good for you.
We're really trying to help. And this is the one instance where we have a chance to flip the script. We can be the rogues. We can be the outsiders.
We can be the power, the establishment, the giant corporations, the tech companies, the grifters, the Bitcoin people. They don't want you to vote. But you know that. You have the power in your hands not to be told what to do, but a giant conglomerate of people who want to take advantage of you.
That's my, turn it around. You follow what I'm saying? Tell people, they're telling you you can't do this. You show them that you can't.
I'm curious, James, I mean, what for you is the most concerning? What keeps you up at night about the November midterm election? That he's going to try to seize ballots. He's already doing that.
He's going to try to put federal forces on the ground. And that real trouble erupts. And the trouble becomes contagious in his friends. Because he's literally playing with more than dynamite here.
He's playing with napalm. And what really keeps me up at night is that he tries this. And then there's some flashpoint. There's some incident.
And the next thing you know, and of course, that's exactly what he wants. So then he can claim, well, I was too bad at night. I was playing harshly. I was self-president.
And, well, so that, yes, that's what keeps me up is that we have an overreaction to what he's almost certainly going to do. I'm curious because Steve Bannon this week, the MAGA architect behind Trump's first campaign, he was talking about the ICE agents being sent into airports. And he was saying how that is basically a test ground for November's election. They're not running the screenings, but they can check IDs.
Is that something you can see happening under the Trump administration? Of course I can. But the idea of having ICE agents in airports is horrifically unpopular. But understand that Bannon is odious as a person.
I'm sure he's smarter than any of them on that side, they call it. And, yes, what he's trying to do, Bannon knows. And even Trump in his own private way knows the Republican is slaughtered in November. So he's trying to lay the groundwork to have something like this.
Because what they do know, what scares me, is they can't have a free and fair election. That is a disaster. Again, that's 57 seats, 248 house seats. I don't know.
I can't translate it, but it's a lot on every level. They know that. They can do everything they can to stop it. It's just literally, that's where we are.
And expect the worst. Expect the worst. In terms of the president, you mentioned him getting slaughtered. He has record low approval right now.
I think to this week it hit 36% approval. Is there any way you see him being able to dig out of that trench between now and November? You know what? I don't.
And I ask other people. All right, give me the scenario where he comes back and gets the 43.5, which would probably cost him the house with 9%. Well, it'd have to be a real spurt of economic growth. By the way, the OEDC, the big international economic forecast, says we're facing 4.2% inflation.
Somehow or another, they're all idiots in Iran, but we have 1.2% inflation. That the Iranian government decides to establish a parliament in Iran and hold free and fair elections and allow U.S. bases on Iranian soil. If you ask me to fantasize how to turn around against it, that would be one of the ways that a combination of those things happen.
Now, how likely they are, I'll leave that to anybody else's mind if that's what happens. The question is, what is more likely? He said 30, let's just say 38%. Let's just give it an even number of consensus.
On October 15th, is that number more likely to be 35 or 41? Or just stay at 38? And my predictive abilities are no better than anybody else's, but I've kind of bet on 35. Fair enough.
Do you think Republicans, in terms of the midterms, probably about some other subjects, do you think they're going to come to regret their whole push to redistrict based on the president's polling, what we've seen with all these shifts in districts, these special elections? They're still pushing, including Florida, for redistricting in some of these cases. Do you think that's going to come back to haunt them? I saw a presentation a month ago from David Wasserman.
I think most people agree he's the kind of resident expert on redistricting house seats. And he said as a result of all this, the Democrats have netted a half a house seat. At the end of the day, when you add up Texas and California and Virginia and Indiana, the public does not much like this. There's a thing that's a referendum right in Virginia.
I've been kind of curious. I mean, definitely, if the presidential election of Virginia today, Democrats have been about 12 points. I'm curious to see how that turned out. The public is fairly uneasy with this.
You saw that manifest itself, even in Indiana State Senate. Yeah, I watched that one very closely. And that was a rare case where we saw Republicans at the state level really watching that. In Kansas, the same thing happened.
It didn't get the same amount of publicity, but Republicans said, no, we're not going to do that. And this is crazy. People, it's crazy to everybody to take the country. The country is, first of all, we're not evenly divided.
We're an overwhelmingly anti-Trump country. And all the part-poled MAGA people in this country retain the sense of that. Hey, it's a very election. Everybody vote.
Whoever wins, we've got to accept it. And we're going to live the consequences. That's clearly not what Trump is. But I think that's where the country is.
And it's going to be a hard slog between 9 and November to get them. And we just, because of those like yours, we've got to be vigilant. We've got to warn people. We've got to be prepared for anything.
You mentioned the MAGA Republicans not being a majority. I found it kind of comical. We were talking about the Iran War. And a lot of folks out of the White House, the comms team, were touting the strong support for the Iran War among MAGA Republicans as their base in terms of, there is support behind it was their argument.
Of course, they also were going to what they would call fake news polls to show the support that they say is out there. But you're saying MAGA Republicans are in the minority at this point. So what do you think of those White House comms where they're really just pushing all this stuff that's just very pro-Trump but not based in reality? Well, I mean, first of all, MAGA is maybe two-thirds of the Republican Party.
I'm just going to have a definitive number. I'm sure people can mine that data to come up with it. But it's not 92% of it. I can tell you that.
And if you look at his Republican approval, his disapproval is now 13, 14, 15. That's a lot. Especially people who are going to stand to see, well, among Republicans, he's 85, 13. Among Democrats, he's 97, you know, 397.
Well, that's a big differential, I know. And, you know, there's a lot of, if you look at Mark Bowman, even, you know, some of the even, you know, really MAGA people like Mark Tuffa or Joe Kenton. You know, we really believed this anti-intervention stuff, man. We really did.
I mean, some people, just anti-intervention stuff, they call it CORE. And a lot of them, you know, a sign of the number of MAGA. Yes, yes, the rest of them say Trump said it. I believe that that settles it.
Okay, those people probably don't change for us. But they're not, they're only two-thirds of 40%. than I'm nearly 51% in a country. You talk about that 13% Republican.
I mean, that's a huge amount when it comes to margins. It's more likely to continue to grow. That's a number that everybody says he's still solid with Republicans. And if you look at it, you go, well, maybe he's got to be more solid than he is now.
I bring that up also because, I mean, where you talk to people and you start to see some of the decline, I mean, we have the Iran war, which I'll get to. But we also have this chaos going on in Washington. And I want to talk about the chaos going on on Capitol Hill. I mean, the president demanded that DHS funding be attached to his Save America Act, which is about voting.
And then he really immediately had to back off of that because Republicans rushed over to the White House and essentially talked him down on this ultimatum for Democrats. But I want to get your thoughts on who is really in control right now when it comes to Republicans. They have the White House, they have the House, they have the Senate, but there appears to be some chaos and it just continually brews as we're in the shutdown that's going on. I mean, we're approaching the longest shutdown in history for DHS.
Well, the one person that we know that is not in charge, that has no influence, is Mark Johnson. I mean, literally, the guy, I guess you could say he's there. He's got to be the most ineffective and compliant Speaker of the House that's ever been. On the Senate side, remember this TSA thing, let me point out that Senator John Kennedy, that's in terms of proof that he's telling you that we worked out of there with all the Republican votes, we could open this, and he told us not to.
Well, it's just come a time that it's probably going to be after the election, unfortunately, there's somebody going to say, well, wait a minute. We're a first branch of government. I think the Congress has established an article one of the Constitution. It means it'd be an article one that found this law as a pretty important institution that for all intents and purposes no longer exists.
So one of the things that will probably happen after November, we'll now go back to heaven, well, can't say the Supreme Court is a separate branch of it, but at least we have one and a half branches of Uncle Brady versus where I am. You think there's going to be some kind of wake-up call among Republicans after the midterms, or you think because Democrats are going to take back the majority? Oh, no. You know, it's one thing to anticipate what getting hit in the mouth by Mike Tyson, if you like.
It's another thing to actually get hit in the mouth by Mike Tyson. Okay, I got hit in the mouth by Mike Tyson in 1994. You have no idea. And it is, I can't, unless you've seen it, you can't describe it.
And what's going to happen is everything, every narrative is going to change, every table TV jock that there's an alignment and the Democrats have lost under 30 and Hispanics and suburban women and AAIP and we're all glad that's just going, whoosh, sucked right out of the door. And they're going to be faced with a highly energized Democratic Party and for a moment about as united as it can get. And they're going to be facing despair. Now, what do they do?
I don't know. They might say we just double down on where we are or how we educate ourselves from this. And what they're going to all wake up and find out is Trump didn't care about him. They all want to win re-election.
They like having staff members and people go to the laundry and find first glass and get picked up at the airport. A lot of them are going to go by the wayside. And they're going to get angry. I really do.
I think the residual anger that's coming to this is going to be pretty noticeable. You're going to see a lot more Margaret Taylor Greene's in the mix. Yeah, I think Margaret Taylor Greene is kind of an independent-minded woman. And she's walked away.
I'm not, I don't exist for you. I have my own. And you start to see that more and more. And what do I propose?
Look, I kind of agree with Jay's that I can't do anything. I'm going to go back home. You're going to go back home anyway. You're dead.
Understand that. You've got no hope. You're going to lose 45 seats. And you can't do anything to stop it.
And he's not going to do any question this position. And he's not going to do one thing. But the only advantage they have is the money advantage. Which just is more corruption than you can imagine.
Than you can imagine. And they can't raise enough special interest money to overcome the anger that people are back. There's not that much money in the world. At the same time, I mean, it doesn't feel like Democrats are also seeing that kind of money race.
And it doesn't really work the same way. I mean, we've seen races where there's been floods of money that they've done nothing. And in this case, you talk about it being just corruption and blatant corruption. I mean, that feels like that could be something that rallies Democrats more than Republicans.
Well, I think it should. And the reason is, I'm not saying Democrats are perfect, but we have no power. So political money tends to follow political power. Now, it also follows the anticipation of political power.
So there's a lot of PACs. There's a lot of funders out there that may be listening to the show and says, look, well, between now and November, you're smart lining up to Republicans, but you better get straight here because come January the 3rd of 2027, you're going to be faced with a whole different world. And as that reality sets into that community, I think you're going to see a pickup in high-end Democratic fundraising. And I think low-end Democratic fundraising is fine for right now.
I mean, in terms of then where we're at on the Hill, they're failing to reach and this partial shutdown. I mean, we're seeing airport lines. I don't know about where you are, but talking about BWI chaos here in Baltimore's local airport is having insane lines. We've seen crazy lines in Houston.
Is this something that Democrats should fear they could get blamed over at any point in this? Not really. You got to be worried about because the Republicans are in total charge of the government. There was actually a Republican solution that Trump...
This is a Trump... Understand, in the coming election, there's one issue and one issue only. Trump. Nothing else matters.
Okay? If you like it, vote Republican. If you don't, vote Democrat. I can't make it any simpler than that.
You talk about the TSA. You can already well put this. We want to separate that out of the bill. We want to stand alone.
We want to vote Republican. The Republicans hate government. They love shutting it down. They love shutting TSA down.
They even came to the point where they tried to... They had a credible plan to reopen it. And of course, Trump is the reason that it's close. This is a Trump...
You cannot say the word Trump too much in a sense. And if you say Republicans, excuse me, I meant Trump. Practice it to mirror. Saying, I will not say 10 words to Rodney's in Trump's name.
I don't know if the Lord's Prayer and Trump really belong together. I'm just to make it up. I'm using an exaggerated point to say you can't bring him enough into the fray. I understand.
You could have been watching him since February 28th where he's been going back and forth over Iran and whether the U.S. is winning this war or whether he'll even call it a war while calling it a war minutes earlier in some cases this week. But he said the U.S. has won the war.
At the same time, though, we are sending thousands of U.S. troops to the region. It's not clear really where this is headed. Republicans on Capitol Hill this week knows that they are frustrated about not getting answers.
What does this all suggest to you, the reality of Trump giving mixed messaging but declaring a victory through it all? Well, it goes back to the origin, the reason of the argument of the war. Now, forget that. The reason this war started is because Trump, quote, felt it in his bones, unquote.
Now, his most famous bone is his bone, alleged, made up bone spur that got him to stay out of the FN. But he said the only reason we did this is because of his bones. Well, his bones are as stupid as his brain. And I think Republicans increasingly know that.
Like Mike Rogers or Roger Wittgen. They're saying it out loud. There's no reason for this. They never gave us a reason.
And, you know, Phil Clay, who's a better than a rock war, he said, look, I served in Iraq. I could have told you why I was there. And it turned out big. Not a very good reason, but there was a reason.
There's no, nobody, no Marine that hits the ground anywhere can tell you because no one knows. Trump doesn't even know. So, you know, sometimes you fight for something like the rock war. There was a reason.
On the surface, it looked like a good reason, but it didn't work out. It turned out to be true that you could use American military right to inform people into being small d Democrats. But it was a reason. Okay, you can actually articulate.
No one can articulate why we're there. It does feel like they're trying to scramble for an off-ramp at this point. I mean, do you see an off-ramp here where they are able to move forward that isn't, one, politically detrimental for them in November, or two, where it doesn't make them just look like they've got on their face? high-end agent of the crown says, you don't think that we're just going to get up and walk out of here, do you?
And Gandhi says, yes, that's exactly what you're going to do. You're going to get up and just walk out of here. Okay, that's what we're going to do. We're just going to get up and go home.
And he may try to get some statement or declaration or something, which is to leave. It's not hard. Just take the general forward, reassign it to the South China Sea, bring everybody back. We build an ordinance, bring all the stuff we got, say, hey, we've got a lot more serious things to do in this world.
You know, our ordinance has been depleted. We're just running out of box. People don't realize that. There's a finite number of bombs here.
And we've hit 17,000 different targets in Iran. We're pounding sand now. And the one thing we know is if you bomb people, they tend not to like it. I can't imagine why somebody would not want to be bombed in the middle of the night, but apparently they don't like it.
I'm curious what your thoughts were if you saw it at all in the early this week where he was talking about Iran and how they gave the U.S. this present. And he wouldn't say what this present was. Apparently, it left White House aides baffled.
What were your thoughts on that when you saw that, if at all, in terms of what you have there? My first thought was the volume is clause of the Constitution, but then I busted out laughing. I would not touch anything. It just makes stuff up.
It's like, it sounds like, because if he says that, it sounds like my people will believe that they're trying to suck up to me because I'm winning the war by something. That's all. It's just another lie. You'll never know because there's nothing at the bottom of it.
Well, that sounds good. I'll just say it. I mean, in terms of getting out of this situation, if the negotiations do move forward, who would this administration be confident in negotiating? We had Jared Kushner.
We had Steve Wickhoff that we bombed. We have J.D. Vance apparently getting in and Margaret Ruby has been in it throughout. I mean, who would you have confidence in this administration to move forward?
The one that gets the biggest pride. I don't know the way it's Jared or who it is, but if anything happens, somebody's going to get the license to build a resort. The only person goes, I don't know, whatever they do, I'll just open up all companies. But that's about it.
You know, usually a career devil match and have these rules and have things that follow their studies. Not now. We just go right to. There's all kinds of stories that say, you know, do arithmetic on how much the Trump family makes in the election.
But it's all of this is done through financial transactions. The policy is the way we do business in the United States today. We don't have diplomats. We have drifters.
And that's who's in charge of the country, who's in charge of peace, in charge of war, in charge of everything. I mean, during your illustrious career, have we ever been in a situation like this that you put your fields seeing with the conflict with Iran? No. This is the question.
When you're in a situation like this, people say, well, you got to admit that the Democrats have this kind of problem or you got to admit that Trump was right to give them an opinion. You know, I could have written a thousand-word essay on why Japan had reasons to be aggrieved on December 1st, 1941. I couldn't have read that same essay on January 1st, 1942 because nothing justified what's happening. And that's my complaint with both sides.
It tries to make a 90-10 situation look like a 50-50 situation. It is no such thing. And if people say, well, James, you had Trump derangement syndrome. My answer is yes.
If we know that time in history where insanity is so prevalent that insanity is actually the same reaction. In the novel, 22, as I pointed out, the guy said, I don't want to fly because I'm insane. And the psychiatrist said, but the fact that you're insane makes you sane. So if you're sane right now, go up to the psychiatrist because you're really truly insane.
If you're insane, you're fine. You're in the profoundly normal range because if something like this can do, this level of creation, if it doesn't make you crazy, then, well, you're crazy. That's what I'd explain. In this crazy world that we're in, do you see a scenario where we're still in Iran in November?
We're bombing Iran in November. Honestly, I'm off the top of my head. I don't know. But, you know, as Jody Barris said, predictions are hard to make, especially about the future.
And especially in the area, but I don't think there's any appetite to be there now. I don't think there's one, but I would love if this country would turn around. I mean, understand, we are Iranian people, some of the most talented people on earth. I mean, half the people in our country have a higher education degree and half of them are women.
I mean, the regime is autocratic, it's not democratic, it has no respect to human rights, it engages in international crime, but the Iranian people are very talented. And I, you know, would dream one day to come back into the community of same nations, but I think what we're doing now is delaying that day, not accelerating that day. I mean, Trump says we're winning. He's apparently watching montage videos as his briefing of us winning.
I'm just curious on your thoughts on that before I let you go. It's a video compilation that is his briefing as he declares the U.S. is militarily winning this war. Well, I'm a veteran of the Vietnam era, and all I heard was how much we were winning.
We were winning so much our history spent. We had little cash with accounts, we dropped more bonds, we did more, but you know what we didn't do? We didn't win the war. And I mean, there's a lot of strategists and people that understand this kind of thing a lot more than I do.
What is winning? I mean, if I watched a baseball game last night, in the future. That was our show with James Carville. I was particularly interested in what he had to say and his ominous warning about the midterms and what Trump might do as he questions the validity of the election.
But Carville making some bold predictions about who will come out on top and saying that Democrats could take not just the House, but he predicts also the Senate. It'll be something to keep an eye on moving forward. For now, we encourage you to join us in the conversation, sign up for our YouTube channel, follow us on social media. With that, I'm Sarah E.
Wall-Weiss with The Daily Beast. Thank you so much. So the good news is we have so many B-beast-tier members now. There are too many names to read out and we really appreciate your support.
Thanks to our production team, Devon Rogerino, Ryan Murray, Rachel Passer, Heather Passaro, Neil Rosenhaus.