PodParley PodParley
PodParley
Case by Case | Court of Appeal confirms that unprotected disclosures cannot later be made confidential and clarifies strict limits on confidentiality under r. 262 and 262A RoP episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 10, 2026 · 1 MIN

Case by Case | Court of Appeal confirms that unprotected disclosures cannot later be made confidential and clarifies strict limits on confidentiality under r. 262 and 262A RoP

from You, me & the UPC · host Bristows LLP

Chloe Dickson talks you through a decision concerning EOFlow’s request for an order that certain information on the extent to which it had committed acts of infringement of Insulet’s patent be designated as confidential and withheld from public inspection.If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at [email protected] all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 10, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case by Case | Court of Appeal confirms that unprotected disclosures cannot later be made confidential and clarifies strict limits on confidentiality under r. 262 and 262A RoP

0:00 1:51

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of You, me & the UPC?

This episode is 1 minute long.

When was this You, me & the UPC episode published?

This episode was published on April 10, 2026.

Can I download this You, me & the UPC episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!