EPISODE · Jul 24, 2026 · 2 MIN
Case by Case | Court of Appeal further address third party access to document
from You, me & the UPC · host Bristows LLP
Patrick Newlands speaks on the CoA's clarification on both the procedural route for challenging decisions on access to documents and the substantive approach to granting such access. The appeal arose from an application by Quinn Emanuel for access to pleadings in concluded infringement proceedings between Huawei and MediaTek. The Judge Rapporteur had granted access subject to redactions, a decision upheld by the Munich Local Chamber (LC). Huawei sought to challenge that outcome, arguing both that the application should not have been granted and that the procedural route adopted was incorrect.Visit of UPC Case Tracker for more UPC decisions, article and podcast.If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at [email protected] all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.
Embed this episode
What this episode covers
Patrick Newlands speaks on the CoA's clarification on both the procedural route for challenging decisions on access to documents and the substantive approach to granting such access. The appeal arose from an application by Quinn Emanuel for access to pleadings in concluded infringement proceedings between Huawei and MediaTek. The Judge Rapporteur had granted access subject to redactions, a decision upheld by the Munich Local Chamber (LC). Huawei sought to challenge that outcome, a...
NOW PLAYING
Case by Case | Court of Appeal further address third party access to document
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.