Case by Case | Düsseldorf Local Division rejects request for preliminary injunction amid doubts over infringement and urgency episode artwork

EPISODE · May 29, 2026 · 4 MIN

Case by Case | Düsseldorf Local Division rejects request for preliminary injunction amid doubts over infringement and urgency

from You, me & the UPC · host Bristows LLP

Eden Winlow explores the Düsseldorf LD decision to refuse Ottobock’s application for provisional measures concerning EP 3 001 984, finding that neither urgency nor infringement was established with the requisite degree of certainty. The application, filed in December 2025, was dismissed in its entirety, with costs awarded against the applicant.If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at [email protected] all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 29, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Case by Case | Düsseldorf Local Division rejects request for preliminary injunction amid doubts over infringement and urgency

0:00 4:43

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of You, me & the UPC?

This episode is 4 minutes long.

When was this You, me & the UPC episode published?

This episode was published on May 29, 2026.

Can I download this You, me & the UPC episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!