Case Study: Anti property investor episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 1, 2024 · 10 MIN

Case Study: Anti property investor

from Investopoly · host Stuart Wemyss

In this case study episode, Stuart delves into the impressive financial journey of a client who staunchly avoids property investment. Starting in 2016 with $760k in shares and $595k in debt, the client had a combined super of $324k and no home loan on a $2.5m residence. With an income of $440k and living expenses of $96k, his net investment assets stood at $490k. Fast forward to today, his shares have grown to $2.15m with a $725k loan and super has increased to $1.07m. Additionally, he acquired a $1.7m holiday house with a $1m debt. Despite receiving a $400k inheritance in 2016, his net investment assets have tripled to $3.2m.Key insights from this journey include the benefits of strategic gearing, disciplined tracking of wealth and performance, and effective cash flow management. The client’s portfolio, focused on growth with a mix of direct stocks and ETFs, benefitted from timely investments in Macquarie and US markets (VTS). A lifestyle-driven decision to purchase a coastal property through a buyer’s agent in 2020 has also paid off, appreciating from $1.4m to $1.7m. Stuart highlights how these strategies and decisions have collectively contributed to a threefold increase in net assets.My new book is available for pre-order now: Pre-ordering the book will help me get it into bookstores. So please do me a favour - please consider pre-ordering now - links and pre-order bonus are available here: https://prosolution.com.au/book-preorder-bonus Do you have a question for the podcast? Email us at [email protected]. If you're interested in working with our team and me, discover how we can work together here: https://prosolution.com.au/family-office-servicesIf this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. Subscribe to my weekly blog: https://prosolution.com.au/stay-connected IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 1, 2024

Embed this episode

In this case study episode, Stuart delves into the impressive financial journey of a client who staunchly avoids property investment. Starting in 2016 with $760k in shares and $595k in debt, the client had a combined super of $324k and no home loan on a $2.5m residence. With an income of $440k and living expenses of $96k, his net investment assets stood at $490k. Fast forward to today, his shares have grown to $2.15m with a $725k loan and super has increased to $1.07m. Additionally, he acquir...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

Case Study: Anti property investor

0:00 10:15

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Investopoly?

This episode is 10 minutes long.

When was this Investopoly episode published?

This episode was published on July 1, 2024.

Can I download this Investopoly episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!