Charlie James discusses biology, sports policies, and SC primary politics episode artwork

EPISODE · Sep 9, 2026 · 9 MIN

Charlie James discusses biology, sports policies, and SC primary politics

from The Charlie James Show Podcast

Host Charlie James opens the segment by discussing biological definitions of sex, emphasizing that genetic testing determines male or female status regardless of self-identification. He highlights an incident where a group of women were reportedly asked to leave a venue for wearing shirts bearing "XX XY". James connects these cultural debates to South Carolina politics, criticizing political stances on gender policies and primary election rules. He specifically points to the Conservation Voters of South Carolina legislative ratings, noting differences in scores among local state representatives.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Sep 9, 2026

Embed this episode

Full Transcript Charlie James: All right, welcome back to the program. Um, well, the rumor of the people that always tell us, "Oh, Charlie! You've got to follow the science, Charlie! The science, they know all about everything, it's all these scientists, they're so smart, Charlie, oh my goodness." Well, the scientists tell us that there are only two options in what you can be. If you've got XX chromosomes, you're a female. If you've got XY chromosomes, you are a male. Period. "Ah, Charlie, but what about how people identify?" It doesn't matter what you identify as. You can identify as a light post, and it doesn't matter. Your head's not going to glow when the—when the sun goes down. None of that's going to matter. If you were—it doesn't matter what you identify as, if they exhumed your body 50 years from now, and they do genetic testing, they're only going to make one of two conclusions: You're a male, or you're a female. Period, that's it. But there are people—there are still people out there that—that just can't wrap their heads around that whole thing. So, there's a—there's a new—there's a line of clothing, it's been out a while, but it's now catching on, mainly because of the WNBA and the fact that some women were wearing these t-shirts, and all they said were "XX XY". That's it, that's all they said on it: "XX, XY". But that's very offensive to some people. So, there was this group of ladies, they went to a—I don't know if it was a sports bar, or a restaurant, or whatever, but they should have known they were in the wrong place when they saw all of the um Palestinian-like gay pride flags hanging all over the place, and when they saw some of the other clientele. But listen to what happened, it's pretty amazing: Audio Clip: "There are people that are in here that are uncomfortable with those shirts, and so I'm asking y'all to leave. If I—if I have to call authorities to get y'all removed, I will, but I don't want to do that. No, no, what I—I am just asking if you would please consider the depth of..." Charlie James: Nope, she's not considering anything because it was offensive to the um—what is it, the LGB—it's the uh—what is it? What's the new term—terminology for it? Producer: 2SLGBTQIA+. Charlie James: Yeah, that community. That's who it's offensive to. Gosh, stop with the fantasy! That's all it is. It's a fantasy, it's a fetish. Period. And now we've got a candidate for the Senate from South Carolina in Dr. Annie Andrews, a pediatrician who is more than willing to go along with all of this ideology. She believes in the transitioning of children, she believes in abortion—I don't—we don't even have any, you know, questions answered for that because nobody in the mainstream media is going to ask her. "Dr. Annie Andrews, at what gestational age is abortion inappropriate for you?" Has anybody—anybody—hey, hey WYFF, have y'all asked her that question? No, of course not, they're not—they're not going to. They're not going to because the newsroom's full of liberals. Nobody's going to ask her that question. "Hey, can you give us a scientific reason for transitioning a child before puberty? Can you give us a good—can you give us a scientific explanation of why using puberty blockers is a good thing?" And by the way, a new study has come out, because they would all say, "Oh, this is for the child's mental health, this is—this is, you know—" No, it's not! It is not. They did a study on mental health of people, male and female, that were given puberty blockers so that they could transition, so they could delay puberty until they could be transitioned. Do you know what difference it made? None. No statistical difference in their mental health whatsoever, and in fact, in some cases, it made it worse. But they still only keep pushing this crap on you. And now we got—we got the WNBA. They're all about this stuff. Nike—Nike just got kicked off of the S&P 100. They're gone, they're out of there. They are close to bankrupt ...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

Ready to play

Charlie James discusses biology, sports policies, and SC primary politics

0:00 9:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Charlie James Show Podcast?

This episode is 9 minutes long.

When was this The Charlie James Show Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on September 9, 2026.

Can I download this The Charlie James Show Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!