Clause and Effect: Section 33 and the Constitutional Conversation episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 24, 2026

Clause and Effect: Section 33 and the Constitutional Conversation

from Runnymede Radio

Professor Eric Adams (University of Alberta) and Professor Dwight Newman (University of Saskatchewan) join us for a friendly debate on the interpretation of section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Recorded before a standing-room-only audience at the University of Alberta Faculty of Law in November 2025, the discussion took place prior to Professor Adams' appointment to the Court of King's Bench of Alberta in April 2026. Professor Adams argues that constitutional "dialogue" leaves open the possibility of judicial engagement with rights, even under a section 33 declaration. Professor Newman argues that section 33 operates as a legislative "shield" against judicial engagement with rights during its application. Moderated by Professor Gerard Kennedy (University of Alberta), the conversation examines competing interpretations of section 33, the proper relationship between courts and legislatures, and the continuing significance of the notwithstanding clause within Canada's constitutional framework.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 24, 2026

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Clause and Effect: Section 33 and the Constitutional Conversation

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this Runnymede Radio episode published?

This episode was published on June 24, 2026.

Can I download this Runnymede Radio episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!