CO Dept. of State v. Baca and Chiafalo v. WA Post-Argument SCOTUScast episode artwork

EPISODE · Jun 9, 2020 · 14 MIN

CO Dept. of State v. Baca and Chiafalo v. WA Post-Argument SCOTUScast

from SCOTUScast · host The Federalist Society

On May 13, 2020, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a pair of cases concerning the Electoral College.In Colorado Department of State v. Baca, the Court will consider the claim of a presidential elector in Colorado who attempted to vote for someone other than Hillary Clinton, despite the fact that Hillary Clinton won Colorado's popular vote, and was replaced by another elector.In Chiafalo v. Washington, the Court will hear the claims of three presidential electors who were each fined $1000 after they voted for a candidate other than Hillary Clinton in 2016, who also won Washington's popular vote. The cases will examine state power to regulate the actions of presidential electors and could affect how electors behave in the 2020 election. To discuss the cases, we have Michael Morley, Assistant Professor at Florida State University College of Law.As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jun 9, 2020

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

CO Dept. of State v. Baca and Chiafalo v. WA Post-Argument SCOTUScast

0:00 14:06

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of SCOTUScast?

This episode is 14 minutes long.

When was this SCOTUScast episode published?

This episode was published on June 9, 2020.

Can I download this SCOTUScast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!