Comps vs. Collectors: Who Really Sets the Market? + The Comp Conundrum – Input, Output, or Both?

In Part 4 of our post-National discussion, Josh Adams, Chris McGill, and I dive into one of the hobby’s most debated topics: comps. Are they the foundation of the market, just one input in a bigger decision-making process, or both? We explore how comps are created, their limits, and why some of the most memorable purchases happen without checking them at all. Plus, a look at the role of repackers, flippers, collectors, and underbidders in shaping prices — and why certain sellers hold more power than ever. Highlights include: Why comps aren’t always the final word — and when to ignore them entirely The “input vs. output” theory of comps and what it means for market movement How the underbidder can have more influence than the winning bidder The impact of repackers, flippers, and institutional buyers on modern card prices Kabooms, Downtowns, and other repack staples that have surged in value Challenges of comping rare or long-untraded cards (and creative ways to do it) Why sellers with great items can command a premium regardless of comps 90s Auctions’ successful National and Josh Adams’ standout pickup Comparing Strongsville to The National as a future show destination Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices