“Consistency Training while Mitigating Obfuscation via Rate Matching” by Sohaib Imran, Prakhar Gupta, Jannes Elstner, David Africa episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 2, 2026 · 24 MIN

“Consistency Training while Mitigating Obfuscation via Rate Matching” by Sohaib Imran, Prakhar Gupta, Jannes Elstner, David Africa

from LessWrong (30+ Karma)

Sohaib Imran, Prakhar Gupta, Jannes Elstner, David Demitri Africa Links: Paper | Code TL;DR. Models condition their behavior on extraneous input features in undesirable ways — for example, on evaluation-likeness (resulting in evaluation gaming), or on the user's preferred answer (resulting in sycophancy). Consistency training teaches a model to behave the same whether or not an extraneous feature/cue is present in the input. Existing methods do this by fine-tuning LLMs to generate responses (BCT) or internal activations (ACT) that would be generated under a clean input, when given an input with a cue. We show this generalises to obfuscation: after BCT, models verbalise cues far less, even when they are influenced by the cues. We introduce a new method, Rate Matching Consistency Training (RMCT), which instead uses RL to match the rate of outcomes across inputs, leaving the rest of the response unconstrained. On the sycophancy benchmark of s Chua et al. (2025), RMCT matches or exceeds BCT at reducing bias-following while leaving verbalisation of the biasing cue largely intact. We think outcome-consistency training of this kind is one of the more natural tools available against evaluation gaming, and below we discuss that [...] ---Outline:(02:10) Extraneous features(05:15) Rate Matching Consistency Training(09:28) Summary of results(14:22) Limitations(15:27) The case for applying Consistency Training to mitigate evaluation gaming(19:09) Why RMCT for mitigating eval gaming?(21:04) A few other pathologies that RMCT is particularly suited to mitigate(21:10) Propensity gaps across modalities/languages/domains/formats.(21:36) Preference for self-generated text.(22:23) Incorporating Consistency Training into the alignment training stack(23:53) Call for feedback The original text contained 8 footnotes which were omitted from this narration. --- First published: July 1st, 2026 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/z2zYWnbGjcs6ypbsj/consistency-training-while-mitigating-obfuscation-via-rate --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO. ---Images from the article:Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 2, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

“Consistency Training while Mitigating Obfuscation via Rate Matching” by Sohaib Imran, Prakhar Gupta, Jannes Elstner, David Africa

0:00 24:35

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of LessWrong (30+ Karma)?

This episode is 24 minutes long.

When was this LessWrong (30+ Karma) episode published?

This episode was published on July 2, 2026.

Can I download this LessWrong (30+ Karma) episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!