Contrasting and Conflicting Efforts to Regulate Big Tech: EU v. US episode artwork

EPISODE · Sep 2, 2025 · 46 MIN

Contrasting and Conflicting Efforts to Regulate Big Tech: EU v. US

from Scaling Laws

Anu Bradford, Professor at Columbia Law School, and Kate Klonick, Senior Editor at Lawfare and Associate Professor at St. John's University School of Law, join Kevin Frazier, AI Innovation and Law Fellow at the University of Texas School of Law and a Senior Editor at Lawfare, to assess the ongoing contrasting and, at times, conflicting regulatory approaches to Big Tech being pursued by the EU and US. The trio start with an assessment of the EU’s use of the Brussels Effect, coined by Anu, to shape AI development. Next, then explore the US’s increasingly interventionist industrial policy with respect to key sectors, especially tech. Read more:Anu’s op-ed in The New York TimesThe Impact of Regulation on Innovation by Philippe Aghion, Antonin Bergeaud & John Van ReenenDraghi Report on the Future of European Competitiveness Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Sep 2, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Contrasting and Conflicting Efforts to Regulate Big Tech: EU v. US

0:00 46:15

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Scaling Laws?

This episode is 46 minutes long.

When was this Scaling Laws episode published?

This episode was published on September 2, 2025.

Can I download this Scaling Laws episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!