Critically re-evaluating a common technique: Accuracy, reliability, and confirmation bias of EMG episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 24, 2016 · 28 MIN

Critically re-evaluating a common technique: Accuracy, reliability, and confirmation bias of EMG

from American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) · host AANEM

Dr. Stephen Goutman interviews Drs. Pushpa Narayanaswami and Seward Rutkove about their article Critically re-evaluating a common technique: Accuracy, reliability, and confirmation bias of EMG. This study supports that in evaluations of radiculopathy (1) serial EMG studies should be performed by the same electromyographer since intrarater reliability is better than interrater reliability; (2) knowledge of clinical information does not bias EMG interpretation substantially, (3) EMG has moderate diagnostic accuracy for radiculopathy with modest specificity and electromyographers should exercise caution interpreting mild abnormalities. Neurology. 2016 Jan 19:86(3):218-23.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 24, 2016

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Critically re-evaluating a common technique: Accuracy, reliability, and confirmation bias of EMG

0:00 28:39

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM)?

This episode is 28 minutes long.

When was this American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) episode published?

This episode was published on March 24, 2016.

Can I download this American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!