EPISODE · Apr 17, 2025 · 5 MIN
Cunningham et al. v. Cornell University et al., Docket No. 23–1007
from 9robes · host 9robes.ai
The Court held that to state a claim under ERISA section 1106(a)(1)(C), a plaintiff need only plausibly allege the elements contained in that provision itself, without addressing potential section 1108 exemptions. The Court reversed the Second Circuit's decision that required plaintiffs to also plead that a transaction was unnecessary or involved unreasonable compensation.music for the podcast provided by Dimitry Taras
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Cunningham et al. v. Cornell University et al., Docket No. 23–1007
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.