Cunningham et al. v. Cornell University et al., Docket No. 23–1007 episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 17, 2025 · 5 MIN

Cunningham et al. v. Cornell University et al., Docket No. 23–1007

from 9robes · host 9robes.ai

The Court held that to state a claim under ERISA section 1106(a)(1)(C), a plaintiff need only plausibly allege the elements contained in that provision itself, without addressing potential section 1108 exemptions. The Court reversed the Second Circuit's decision that required plaintiffs to also plead that a transaction was unnecessary or involved unreasonable compensation.music for the podcast provided by ⁠ Dimitry Taras

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 17, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Cunningham et al. v. Cornell University et al., Docket No. 23–1007

0:00 5:41

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of 9robes?

This episode is 5 minutes long.

When was this 9robes episode published?

This episode was published on April 17, 2025.

Can I download this 9robes episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!