CURRENTS: Consent for Brain Death Determination - the ends justify the means... or it does not. episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 3, 2024 · 21 MIN

CURRENTS: Consent for Brain Death Determination - the ends justify the means... or it does not.

from Neurocritical Care Society Podcast · host Neurocritical Care Society

The purpose of informed consent, as it exists now, is primarily to maintain patient autonomy, but additional benefits include the protection of patients, avoidance of fraud, and promotion of rational decisions, amongst others. It is now considered both an ethical and legal obligation which should, at a minimum, always include: 1) the nature of the procedure, 2) the risks and benefits of the procedure, 3) reasonable alternatives, and 4) risks and benefits of alternatives, with an assessment of comprehension of these elements (1). This week Dr Lauren Koffman is joined by Clotilde Balucani, MD and Julia Durrant, MD two of the authors of the recent Currents article Consent for Brain Death Determination - the ends justify the means... or it does not.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 3, 2024

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

CURRENTS: Consent for Brain Death Determination - the ends justify the means... or it does not.

0:00 21:57

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Neurocritical Care Society Podcast?

This episode is 21 minutes long.

When was this Neurocritical Care Society Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on July 3, 2024.

Can I download this Neurocritical Care Society Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!