David Responds to Trolls

from Advisory Opinions Hosted by The Dispatch

David takes the first ten minutes to respond to Twitter trolls over his latest New York Times article before he and Sarah revisit their arguments over the Supreme Court’s per curium ruling on the Trump-Colorado case. The Agenda: —Defending the Supreme Court —Erasing the Constitution —Confusion over the Trump ruling —Consequentialism vs. originalism —Judicial restraint and originalism —Erasing Chevron —SCOTUS hears bump stock case —Explaining the string cheese factors Show Notes: -Kevin Williamson: Slate Publishes Gun-Control Fiction -Advisory Opinions Episode with Professor Amanda Tyler

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

Ready to play

David Responds to Trolls

0:00 1:15:07

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Share this episode

Similar podcasts

Beyond the Neutral Zone beyondtheneutralzone We are 4 idiots that like to talk about sports but will follow the conversation wherever it leads.Year-round general sports conversation and opinions with a main focus on the NFL. Daily Cuts The best interviews from CNA 938 on current affairs, health, entertainment and money, curated dailyThe views and opinions shared during this podcast series are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of Mediacorp Pte. Ltd. or its group of companies.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Advisory Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 15 minutes long.

When was this Advisory Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on March 7, 2024.

Can I download this Advisory Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.