EPISODE · Aug 20, 2020 · 49 MIN
Debating Sagan v. Waltz 2.0, US Military Coup Question, the Liberal's China Contradictions, Kamala's Foreign Policy | Ep. 63
from The Un-Diplomatic Podcast · host Van Jackson
Proliferation optimism or pessimism? Van weighs in on the classic Sagan-Waltz debate. Why liberals are of two minds about China. And what's wrong with advocating for a military coup in the United States? A lot! Dan Nexon's Tweet: https://twitter.com/dhnexon/status/1293350893446926340Adam Mount's Tweet: https://twitter.com/ajmount/status/1293063724161474560?s=20Tom Le's Tweet: https://twitter.com/profTLe/status/1291893103985438720Hunter Marston's Tweet: https://twitter.com/hmarston4/status/1292229570360311808?s=19Jonathan Hunt's Tweet: https://twitter.com/JRHunTx/status/1292004341461680130Edward Fishman on liberal internationalism: http://bostonreview.net/war-security/edward-fishman-death-and-rebirth-american-internationalismContributors: Jake Dellow, Gaby Magnuson, Pete McKenzie, Ciara Mitchell
Embed this episode
What this episode covers
Proliferation optimism or pessimism? Van weighs in on the classic Sagan-Waltz debate. Why liberals are of two minds about China. And what's wrong with advocating for a military coup in the United States? A lot!
NOW PLAYING
Debating Sagan v. Waltz 2.0, US Military Coup Question, the Liberal's China Contradictions, Kamala's Foreign Policy | Ep. 63
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.