Delaware v. Pennsylvania episode artwork

EPISODE · May 31, 2024 · 29 MIN

Delaware v. Pennsylvania

from Supreme Court Opinions · host SCOTUS Opinions

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you’ll hear the Court’s opinion in Delaware v Pennsylvania.  The Disputed Instruments, prepaid financial instruments used to transfer funds to a named payee, are sold by banks on behalf of MoneyGram and others. When these instruments are not presented for payment within a certain period of time, they are deemed abandoned. MoneyGram applies the common-law escheatment practices outlined in 1965 by the Supreme Court: The proceeds of abandoned financial products should escheat to the state of the creditor’s last known address, or where such records are not kept, to the state in which the company holding the funds is incorporated. MoneyGram does not keep records of creditor addresses but transmits the abandoned proceeds to its state of incorporation. States invoked the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction to determine whether the abandoned proceeds of the Disputed Instruments are governed by the Disposition of Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler’s Checks Act (FDA), which provides that a money order or “similar written instrument (other than a third-party bank check)” should generally escheat to the state in which the instrument was purchased, 12 U-s-c  2503. The Court held that the Disputed Instruments are sufficiently similar to money orders to fall within the FDA’s “similar written instrument” category. Being prepaid makes them likely to escheat. The FDA was passed to abrogate common law because, for instruments like money orders, the entities selling such products often did not keep records of creditor addresses, resulting in a “windfall” to the state of incorporation. Bank liability is not a trigger for exclusion, given that banks can be liable on money orders, which are expressly covered. Whatever the intended meaning of “third-party bank check,” it cannot be read broadly to exclude prepaid instruments that escheat inequitably due to the business practices of the company holding the funds. The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you. 

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you’ll hear the Court’s opinion in Delaware v Pennsylvania.  The Disputed Instruments, prepaid financial instruments used to transfer funds to a named payee, are sold by banks on behalf of MoneyGram and others. When these instruments are not presented for payment within a certain period of time, they are deemed abandoned. MoneyGram applies the common-law escheatment practices outlined in 1965 by the Supreme Court: The proceeds of abandoned financial products should escheat to the state of the creditor’s last known address, or where such records are not kept, to the state in which the company holding the funds is incorporated. MoneyGram does not keep records of creditor addresses but transmits the abandoned proceeds to its state of incorporation. States invoked the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction to determine whether the abandoned proceeds of the Disputed Instruments are governed by the Disposition of Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler’s Checks Act (FDA), which provides that a money order or “similar written instrument (other than a third-party bank check)” should generally escheat to the state in which the instrument was purchased, 12 U-s-c  2503. The Court held that the Disputed Instruments are sufficiently similar to money orders to fall within the FDA’s “similar written instrument” category. Being prepaid makes them likely to escheat. The FDA was passed to abrogate common law because, for instruments like money orders, the entities selling such products often did not keep records of creditor addresses, resulting in a “windfall” to the state of incorporation. Bank liability is not a trigger for exclusion, given that banks can be liable on money orders, which are expressly covered. Whatever the intended meaning of “third-party bank check,” it cannot be read broadly to exclude prepaid instruments that escheat inequitably due to the business practices of the company holding the funds. The opinion is presented here in its entirety, but with citations omitted. If you appreciate this episode, please subscribe. Thank you.

NOW PLAYING

Delaware v. Pennsylvania

0:00 29:03

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

The Laura Ingraham Show Laura Ingraham The most-watched woman in the history of cable news brings her no-holds-barred political and cultural commentary to podcasting with The Laura Ingraham Show. A bestselling author, breast cancer survivor, and mother of three internationally adopted children, Laura was the most listened-to woman in talk radio before launching her own podcast. A trailblazer across media platforms, she brings a unique perspective to this twice-weekly show, drawing on her experience as a white-collar criminal defense litigator and a Supreme Court law clerk.New episodes drop twice a week—delivering the clarity, courage, and common sense America needs. SGP Radio Originals SGP Radio I conduct interviews, talk about the real & fake of wrestling, giving my takes & opinions on social and current matters and there's much more in store. Follow SGP Radio to know when new content is live and on demand.SGP Radio is a nonstop 24/7 broadcast and podcast radio station by Gerald Roberts Hotline: 917-283-8956 For bookings, guest spots, interviews and all other SGP Radio inquiries contact Gerald Roberts emailing [email protected]. All content on SGP Radio ancillary and primary platforms are the original works of those associated with SGP Radio or third party content that SGP Radio has written consent to reproduce and redistribute. Recommendation: Must Be 18 years or olderAdvertising Disclaimer: Ads on our platforms don't inherently reflect the views of our company, affiliates or those associated with us.SGP Radio Hotline: 718-952-8034 or 917-283-8956 on WhatsApp<a href="https://www.sgpradio.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopene Two Flawed Broads Two Flawed Broads Two Flawed Broads is a podcast hosted by two women who are unapologetically themselves. With humor and wit, they discuss their journeys of self-discovery and personal growth. The hosts, Alexys and Sherri, discuss a variety of topics, from pop culture to politics, and share their personal experiences and opinions and encourage their listeners to do the same. Join these two flawed but fabulous women as they offer a fresh perspective on the world around us. Across The Pond Liberty Stacia Whittecar and Kirstin Clark Welcome to "Across the Pond Liberty," the podcast that paints the New York Liberty's journey in vibrant colours, uniting fans from both sides of the Atlantic. Join hosts Stacia from Kansas and Kirstin from Scotland, as they embark on an exhilarating season-long journey with the Liberty, delivering the latest news, updates, and a shared passion for the team. Meet Your Hosts: 🏀 Stacia: Hailing from Kansas, Stacia's love for the New York Liberty transcends geographical boundaries. With her deep understanding of the game and unwavering support for the team, Stacia is your guide to all things Liberty, both on and off the court. 🏀 Kirstin: Crossing the ocean from Scotland, Kirstin adds an international touch to the podcast. Her genuine passion for the Liberty and her unique perspective from across the pond contribute a fresh outlook that connects fans worldwide. Diving into the Liberty's World: "Across the Pond Liberty" is you

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Supreme Court Opinions?

This episode is 29 minutes long.

When was this Supreme Court Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on May 31, 2024.

What is this episode about?

Welcome to Supreme Court Opinions. In this episode, you’ll hear the Court’s opinion in Delaware v Pennsylvania.  The Disputed Instruments, prepaid financial instruments used to transfer funds to a named payee, are sold by banks on behalf of...

Can I download this Supreme Court Opinions episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!