Did Deputy “Execute” Airman Roger Fortson, or Is That Defamation

If you'd like immediate and early access to Law of Self Defense content, consider becoming a Law of Self Defense Member for just 99¢ here --- https://lawofselfdefense.com/trialIntentionally and falsely characterizing someone of having committed a crime is generally defamation per se, meaning that the person wrongfully accused is presumptively entitled to monetary damages.  Even worse, when this kind of unmerited and gratuitous reputation destruction is done for reasons of personal profit—a few more YouTube bucks, for example--it would seem particularly contemptible behavior.  Today we explore the question of whether explicitly labeling former Deputy Eddie Duran’s shooting of Airman Roger Fortson as having “executed Fortson for exercising his Constitutional rights” might qualify as precisely this kind of defamation per se.  This question is, of course, prompted by the repeated publication of Attorney William Kirk, on his YouTube channel Washington Gun Law (WGL) of the explicit claim that Duran executed Fortson merely because he was exercising his Constitutional rights.Promised links from today’s show:LOSD: REAL LAWYER | The Roger Fortson Shooting: Awful? Lawful? Both? (5/13/24) https://youtube.com/live/Zy1xcbAU2l0 WGL: The Florida Man Who Was Executed for Exercising His Constitutional Rights (5/13/24) https://youtu.be/IWepSw11YiA?si=hO7QaGkgk1QbgflQ LOSD: Sound Legal Analysis, or Shameful Misinformation? (5/15/24) https://www.youtube.com/live/JEf63eHv0ac?si=dnHROCOoL2N1pFPZ WGL: Charges Filed Against the Deputy Who Ended This Man's Life Because He Was Armed (8/25/24) https://youtu.be/BPN8V2SgUkE?si=onqmYu0nW4j6SepR Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office: OPS Administrative Investigation (5/30/24)https://lawofselfdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/IA-2024-012-Final-Report-002-1.pdfFlorida First Judicial Circuit State’s Attorney Press Release (8/23/24)https://lawofselfdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/State-Attorneys-press-release-information.pdfTHERE IS ONLY ONE SELF-DEFENSE "INSURANCE" PROVIDER I TRUST!There are lots of self-defense "insurance" companies out there. Some are hot garbage. Some have limited resources. Some are simply, in my view, untrustworthy. But there is ONE that I PERSONALLY TRUST to protect myself and my family.LEARN which ONE I TRUST by clicking HERE:https://lawofselfdefense.com/trustDisclaimer - Content is for educational & entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice. If you are in need of legal advice you must retain competent legal counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.