This message comes from Viking, committed to exploring the world in comfort, journey through the heart of Europe, on an elegant Viking longship with thoughtful service, destination-focused dining and cultural enrichment on board and on shore, and every Viking voyage is all inclusive, with no children and no casinos. Discover more at Viking.com. Everybody needs money. That's why they call it money.
Oh, this thing's a life on free! But you can get up to the present! From full global headquarters, this is Motley Cool Money. It's the Motley Cool Money Radio Show.
I'm Chris Ellen joining me in studio this week, from Million Dollar Portfolio, Jason Moser and Matt Argesinger and from Motley Cool Pro and Options, Jeff Fisher. Good to see you as always, gentlemen. Hey, good to see you. Earning Spalooza continues.
We've got the latest results from Wall Street. Freaking Nomix co-authors Stephen Dunder is our special guest this week. And as always, we'll give you an inside look at the stocks on our radar. Because let's start with the Magic Kingdom.
Second quarter profits for the Walt Disney Company. Up 10% that was better than expected because a year ago, the big story was frozen. So good news that they beat, Jeff. But despite the beat, stock down just a little bit this week, which makes me wonder if this stock is a little pricey.
There's no question it's a little pricey, but I don't believe it's overpriced. Disney is doing so well on every front, really, even ESPN. But from their movie department to their theme parks to their cable networks, they're just doing extremely well. And they have so much that's going in the right direction going forward.
So Marvel Age of Ultron, this weekend, one of the highest grossing weekend films of all time. The other two, or all three are Marvel, Avengers, Age of Ultron, Iron Man 3. Iron Man 3. So Disney has three of the highest grossing opening weekend films of all time, all bought from Marvel, which they paid only $4 billion in 2009.
What a steal. What a steal. What a steal. They have Shanghai Disney resorts opening next year, and they're very excited about that.
Shanghai, pretty big market over there. I would say. And of course, Star Wars coming out December 18th. But they're already making money on that from Star Wars Rebels, and from a new game is coming out in November.
So Chris, they paid $4 billion for Lucasfilm in 2012, which I think was again, enough just a steal. Yeah, I mean, we were talking about this earlier. Bob Iger, the CEO, gets a lot of credit. And yet I still feel like he doesn't get enough credit for these acquisitions because we're not even talking all that far in the past.
When you look at Marvel and Lucasfilm for less than $9 billion. It's unbelievable. They're going to make that back in no time. No, I know.
And each time investors, including investors, I include myself at times, when we looked at the Marvel buyout, we looked at Lucasfilm out, we thought, gosh, we're paying a pretty penny for those. But my goodness, I mean, what Disney can do with those properties at those value points is incredible. No one else can do it. I mean, we can go back to Pixar.
Now that's 13 or so years ago now. But the $7 billion they paid for that has just paid over and over again. And I expect the same with Marvel and Lucasfilm. And Jeff mentioned ESPN, though.
The one thing about Disney that has me a little bit concerned is the higher sports costs are just getting very high for ESPN. When you talk about buying college football games and NFL and all that. I mean, the costs are just getting higher. And that's only one segment of the business.
But one of the things that buy-by-gird has done for Disney, if you look at the operating margins of this company over the last 10 years, they've almost doubled. And that's remarkable for a company of Disney size. And they've been able to do that because of his actions to just the studio business and increasing the efficiencies across the board. But those margins, you might start to question those.
If the content cost that Disney has to pay, start to go up. And it's just something you can start about. That's a good point, Matt. That said, advertising revenue grew 18% at ESPN this last quarter.
And of all companies, of course, Disney has the wherewithal to pay up for that content. And I think they have the smarts to make sure that it'll be profitable. But it's a true concern, as with Netflix, as with content, is becoming king. It's expensive stuff.
Speaking of content, it's estimated that Star Wars has brought in $27 billion as a franchise since its inception. And a lot of that, more than half, is toys and games. While the movies have only brought in $4 billion. It's nice to see them placing these bets, so to speak, on things like Star Wars and getting an even more diverse revenue stream.
Because I think the big question is really with ESPN, how they embrace that digital age and mobile entertainment. And it remains to be seen how we're going to see this all play out with the traditional cable package slowly, which surely disappearing. So I can't help but wonder if Disney hasn't hit that under-armour moment, where the market just expects nothing but perfection. And if they fail to deliver that perfection, well, then you won't see the stock really do anything special.
But that doesn't take away from the quality of this company. And I think the bigger question is leadership. And then once Iger's gone, who's taking over? It's true.
Shares are at about 19 times forward earnings estimates. So they're traded about in line with the market. But I think it's a above-average company. Final thought on Disney is rumors.
And it might be confirmed now that there's going to be a Boba Fett or Boba Fett. We have this debate at home all the time. It sounds like it's Boba, dad. Get it right.
A Boba Fett only movie that just tells his backstory. And you can start to do that with so many characters. Oh, they're really interesting. Yeah.
On the face of its second quarter results for Whole Foods, were pretty good. Rekord revenue, same store sales up more than 3 and 1-1-2%. But the company also announced a new retail concept aimed at millennials. And Jason Wall Street really doesn't seem to like this idea.
Have to mention, co-CEO John Mackie sits on the board of directors here at the Motley Fool. Shares down this week. What do you think of this new concept? So I mean, the new concept will be interesting to see.
I mean, it's worth noting that it is something that will be additive to their opportunity they see at $1,200. So it's not those $1,200. That's not inclusive. I mean, we'll see potentially additional stores on top of that $1,200.
They see the market opportunity for. But I mean, I think with Whole Foods really, the low hanging fruit has been picked here. They're not special anymore. And there are plenty of other concepts out there that are more or less trying to replicate what they're doing.
And that's not a bad thing. I mean, you have your imitators and the people that are trying to sort of do what you're doing. That means you're doing something well. But along with that, we see Greater Competition, which is playing out on their margin line margin per time a little bit.
And I think the market was certainly not too enthusiastic about the comps number that they gave out for this current quarter that we're in. They see a comps number of this current quarter running at a 2.8% rate versus 4. 4.3% last year. So I'm just playing out.
It's not surprising any of us. It's just a much more competitive industry than it was even just a year ago. That doesn't mean, though, that this isn't an investment we're hanging on to. I think the market actually is giving us a gift this week because when you look at this, they're going to double their store base at least here in the coming decade and beyond.
So if you can be a patient shareholder and hang on to those shares for a while, this is probably going to turn out to be a winner for you. Well, and I think there's a little part of this that has nothing to do with Whole Foods. And it's not their fault. But Tesco tried this type of concept.
Smaller footprint stores aimed at affluent millennials. It did not work at all for Tesco. And I think that to some degree, Mattie, people are looking at this and saying, well, it didn't work for them. We're not sure it's going to work for you.
Right. And I tend to give Whole Foods a benefit of that and see what they can do with this concept. Because to me, especially at that millennial level urban walking neighborhoods is what that generation wants. And the idea of having a premium sort of bodega, a premium deli or a place where you can get fresh groceries and maybe prepared meals seems pretty good to me.
So I think the selloff, I agree, I think Jason, that the selloff here, the stock is down well over almost 15% now from when that earnings came out. And that seems a little too harsh. Very interesting buffets comments on Whole Foods this past week or something. He was saying something that he doesn't see smiles on people's reasons.
Right. When you go in there, I don't see anybody smiling. He's still a Coca-Cola world after all. I just have to believe that sort of old school thing is where I'm on.
He's kind of talking his book. That's a smile. I love it there. It's a great place.
So I think Wall Street, as you guys just talked about, is most concerned that Whole Foods has been trying to value approach. They've been lowering prices and it hasn't resulted in the sales uptick that has been hoped for. And this small new concept that they haven't named yet, it won't be called Whole Foods these many stores. Some other name they're going to reveal in the next month or two.
They're taking a value approach there too. So concerns are margins will be lower. Probably worth soliciting our listeners to come in with some ideas for names. Radio at full.com, if you have a suggestion for Whole Foods, we'll pass it along.
I think Quickster is available. Pretty good first quarter for Tesla Motors. Revenue came in higher than expected. Guidance for 2015 is looking good.
But Mattie, some investors wondering not just about the future of battery powered vehicles, but battery powered homes. The event where Elon Musk unveiled the Powerwall battery, you can get it for your home. You excited about this? It was a little bit.
No, I'm excited about the concept. I'm excited about the idea. And I think it's going to have some serious legs to it. But just for Tesla's quarter, let's focus on the auto business for a moment.
They delivered over 10,000 vehicles. Revenue was up 55% over a year. They're now at a production level. They're delivering more than 1,000 vehicles a week on track to get over 55,000 model S and model S and model S deliveries in 2015.
That's huge. The automotive gross margin, 26%, we talked about that before. That is the envy of the auto industry. That puts them in luxury territory.
And the model S is on target for Q3. So the core business is very good. Now the Tesla energy business, Chris, Powerwall, it came off a little bit of a dud because I think people were applying, leaving it as this revolution that's going to start with these batteries. It's the start of that.
They really are the glorified kind of backup generator for your house. But it also allows you to pay, stop paying peak utility rates because essentially what the battery, one of the things the battery does is it buys, if you don't have solar power, it's charging it, it'll buy power during the day when electricity rates are lower and deliver that power in the morning, when rates are higher. So you can save some energy costs there. That said, at a price point of between $3,300 and $3,500, one of these things fully charged will basically power your refrigerator for a few hours, maybe some other appliances and maybe charge your phone laptop.
So it really, the technology is not quite there yet. But I think it's a great start to what I do think is going to be a pretty big revolution. Trip advisor, first quarter profit and revenue, lower than expected, but Jason stocks still up for the week. What's going on?
The numbers they brought were just really impressive. I think this is like the online shopping mall for trips. You want to find anything out about anything where you might want to go. This is really the place to go.
Excluding currency effects are top line, 36%. That's pretty impressive. What I'm encouraged by with this company is they continue to diversify their revenue stream away from advertising. So they have subscriptions and transactions and other revenue they generate.
That represented a year ago, it was 15% of overall revenues. This quarter is 21%. So that's encouraging to me as well. And then they continue to diversify that revenue stream.
And I've always said it's going to be easier for Trip Advisor to try to become more like Priceline. And it's going to be for Priceline to become more like Trip Advisor. Because Trip Advisor has really gained the trust of travelers worldwide in being the place to go get really relevant and accurate reviews. And then look at the monthly unique visitors now.
This quarter they reported 340 million versus 260 million a year ago. And we always say advertisers go where the eyeballs are. And they are certainly on Trip Advisor's platform. I'll just point out that Trip Advisor is recommended across many Motley Fool services.
Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. Chris Hill here with Jason. Most are Matt, Ardisinger and Jeff Fisher. Curry Green Mountain falling this week after second quarter results came in lower than expected.
Management was optimistic about the new Brewer, Mattie and the new pods. Thought they were going to be a hit and that is absolutely not the case. Right. I mean if you look at the current, the past results were actually mostly in line but it really came down to the guidance and Chris you said it.
I mean they're going now, they're expecting now flat to low single digit sales growth for the year down from high single digits growth. They really cut their EPS and cash for expectations. And it really comes down to the fact that the current 2.0, the new pods are not selling well. And I think that's pretty obvious.
I mean if you think about it, you have a lot of people who own current machines and why do they have a lot of things to upgrade. They're also selling more of the branded pods, Starbucks, Kraft, Dunkin, Donuts and margins on those are much lower. They're kind of cannibalizing the Green Mountain's own King Cup. So getting hit from both sides and the stock is down actually about 35% from its all-time high.
It's still training for close to 30 times earnings. So given the year they're going to have, I'd say this is one you probably still want to avoid. I got to give credit to our colleague Ron Gross because he called this months ago when they came out with the new pods that weren't going to work with the old machines and he said boy, they better manage this right or people are going to get annoyed. And they certainly haven't.
So Ron was saying the Green Mountain was indeed not going to be firing on all cylinders. Exactly. So Papa John's hitting a new all-time high this week. First quarter profits were up, revenue was up, they raised guidance for the full fiscal year.
What's not to love, Jeff? It's, you know, Disney is a fun stock to own for your family pizza as well. So if you're trying to get your kids involved or your family in general pizza, Papa John's is up 600% the last 10 years. Domino's is up 500%.
So you could be eating pizza and getting paid to eat it, making money while you eat it. So everything's going well. North American, same-store sales were up 6% more than 6%. And as Billy Kipperstock, the pro analyst who covers Papa John's pointed out to me, that's 18 consecutive quarters where same-store sales have been up.
International sales are up big, nearly 8% same-store sales up 8%. They're focused on growing international further. Their mobile app is really driving sales. They really tackle technology early.
It's so easy to click on your phone and order a pizza that's driving a lot of sales. And now they just rolled out Pay Share where you can share the bill with your friend as you order it. I like the idea of someone paying for my pizza. Yeah, no, and we talked about the show.
I think companies like Papa John's who have figured out the mobile app. I mean, their mobile app is so simple to use. It's very easy to customize your order in your pizzas. It makes it all simple.
Restaurants that figure that out are going to do really well. Yeah, it's making a big difference. It changes your habits. Sure does.
SolarCity out with first quarter results this week. 87% from a year ago, so more customers with solar power. They're growing installations, Matt. They're not really growing revenue though.
Right. Yeah, the model, again, the model is really hard to understand. I mean, essentially there's so much upfront costs for revenue stream that will stretch out for decades with SolarCity. So it's tough to focus on the revenue.
What I focus on is, you know, 28,000 new customers in the quarter. They deployed 153 megawatts. That's more than a double. That's almost a double from a year ago, I should say.
The backlog is huge. They have 237 megawatts worth of installations that they booked in the past quarter that they've yet to install. So, and they've got two new kind of interesting products coming out. They've got the Home Sorge segment, which is really coming off of Tesla's Powerwall, which is going to combine solar panels with the Tesla battery pack.
And they've got this microgrid concept that's really interesting, which is essentially, you know, they're going to combine residential solar panels, battery packs, and inverters to essentially develop these microgrids that are smart demand response that they can manage to apply in demand, either for entire cities or, you know, maybe small corporate office parks. So, really good stuff at SolarCity. And I just, I think don't sweat the short term stuff when it comes to this company. This week Fitbit, the maker of wearable fitness tracking devices, filed the necessary paperwork to go public.
So, later this year, we'll see if that is popular with investors. But you know what, it is a hit with investors guys. Chicken and biscuits. Bojangles.
Bojangles. I'm Shane, went public on Friday at $19 a share. The stock up more than 25% on opening day. Jason Moser, I know you love the food.
The Jangler. Do you like the stock? I, you know, this is probably one of those occasions where I like the food, not the biggest fan of the stock. You know, the problem is with the sake of none of the cash from this IPO is going towards the company and growing.
I mean, this is just going to current shareholders of the company. So, that's a bit of a concern of mine. The other concern I have is it's, I am just not quite certain that they will be able to translate, you know, across the country as they think they may be able to. Very popular in the South East.
Exactly. So, I'm not moving up here from Georgia. I mean, there are lots of Bojangles and a lot of people love it for good reasons, good stuff. But I just, I'm not quite certain that the market opportunity is as big as they see it.
Now, with that said, I do like the fact that they own, you know, a good chunk of those stores. They franchise some out as well, but, but owning a lot of those stores I think is, is encouraging, you know, kind of interested to see how that strategy plays out over time. But this is one where I'm going to sit here and just watch on the sidelines probably just go get me a, you know, a Cajun biscuit. Steve, right now, I know it's never going to topple Olive Garden as your number one restaurant choice.
But have you ever been to a Bojangles ever sampled the fair there? Probably at some point. I mean, there's like, Bojangles feels like a McDonald's sort of restaurant, so probably driving down South I had been to a Bojangles, I believe. But it doesn't sound like it was necessarily a memorable experience.
Not so much. You know what? I think we'll get Jason to take you on a little tour. I'm all in.
Let's do it. Mr. Bojangles. Mr.
Bojangles. Mr. Bojangles. Mr.
Bojangles. Alright, Jason, those are Matt, Argusinger, Jeff Fisher, guys. Thanks for being here. We'll see you a little bit later in the show.
Attention all listeners. If you're looking for a little extra money, I've got some good news. Freakonomics co-authors, Stephen Dumner is up next to talk about the best time to rob a bank. Stay right here.
You're listening to Motley Full Money. Welcome back to Motley Full Money. I'm Chris Hill. Joining me now from Freakonomics Studio in New York City is Stephen Dumner.
He is the co-author of the best selling Freakonomics books. He's the host of Freakonomics Radio, and his latest book with co-authors Stephen Levitt is When to Rob a Bank and 131 more warp suggestions and well-intended rants. Stephen, welcome back. Hey Chris, thank you very much.
So 10 years ago, you're getting ready to publish Freakonomics. It's your first book with Levitt. You obviously have to have a website to go along with it to promote the book. There's a blogging feature.
And one I can only guess is something that sort of sets the tone for your relationship with Stephen Levitt. For how you're going to work over the next decade, you basically just say, let's try blogging. Yeah, that was exactly it. So I wasn't devoted to blogging.
I mean, blogs, this was 2005. So blogging was, I would say, about to hit, it's about to enter today. I mean, there were certainly a lot of blogs around, but the next few years we turned out to be really great for blogs, which we kind of lucked into. And our web designer said, she literally said, you know, this has a blogging function.
Do you want me to turn it off? And I said, I don't know. What do you think? You know, should we think about blogging blah, blah, blah?
And I like the idea, honestly, immediately because when you write a book, the minute you put it out, it's unchangeable, right? Even ebooks, you know, books aren't updated very often, especially print books. So the idea of a blog was, hey, we can respond to stuff or things change or if we find out more information. So both Levitt and I, we just started writing a little bit together, but mostly separately, 10 years ago, as you say, and we just kept at it.
And for reasons that we could never explain, we just loved it. And I think if you had to come up with an explanation, which we tried and mostly failed to do, we just, it was nice to have a conversation with readers and nice to have a reason to stay very interested in anything in the world going on that you might have an interest in. So really, it's a journal in a way, but an online journal related to topics that we've written about in Freakonomics, but then going way, way, way beyond that as well. And out of the thousands and thousands of blog posts, you've sort of cherry picked some of the more interesting and fun and provocative ones.
So let's just start with the title. When is the best time to rob a bank? I'm asking for a friend. All right, tell your friend, Chris, easily the best time to rob a bank is never.
Bank robbery is a crappy crime. Now, this may be because the typical bank robber is a pretty crappy thief. So, you know, the data on this turned out to be pretty interesting. If you look at the most successful time, for instance, to rob a bank, there wasn't that much variance in days of the week Friday was kind of a bigger day, but there wasn't that much variance in days a week, but time of day there was a lot of variance.
So it turns out that you're much more successful robbing a bank if you rob it in the morning. And yet, the majority of bank robberies take place in the afternoon. And as it turns out, most bank robbers, bank robbers, a bank robber will get caught on average after three robberies. And since the average take is not very much in this country, you know, let's say maybe $1,000, it's just a stupid crime to do.
But the interesting part in there for us then became, well, if mornings are better, why so many in the afternoon? Maybe they just don't know, right? Whenever you're analyzing data, you have to figure out there may just be a lack of knowledge. Or it could be that, you know, the kind of person who gets to bank robbery gets to bank robbery because they can't get up in the morning and if they did, they'd have a regular job like the rest of us.
Do you think Hollywood is to blame? It does seem. You know, you look at some movies. It does seem, it can be kind of glamorous.
Bank robbery? Yeah, you know, the image of the gentleman banded, that sort of thing, which can't seem to be in the same day. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I think that, you know, I'm trying to think, you know, if it were I, I would much rather imbezzle than rob a bank.
It's just too obvious, you know, it's like, like the famous quote, it's where the money is. It's like everybody knows that. And therefore, banks have had hundreds of years to come up with ways to minimize. I mean, look, when you walk into a bank, you'll notice there isn't a whole lot of machinery in place to prevent bank robberies.
Why? Because not that many people rob banks. If there were a lot more robbing than we'd see a whole lot more invested in that. But the fact is, is that not that many people do it and get away with it.
So yeah, if you're looking for a real crime, this post about when Rob Bank actually began was related to this woman that I'd heard about when I was visiting in Iowa, she lived out there and she had embezzled from the bank where she worked. It was actually owned by her father. And the way she did it was basically by keeping two sets of books. And then when she was ultimately arrested and she helped prosecutors figure out how to stop this kind of crime in the future, she realized one insight of hers was that if you're keeping two sets of books, like she was, you can never take a vacation because there's the rest that somebody else is going to discover that.
And so one great metric to look for for embezzlement, let's say, or any other kind of crime, is when people are not using up their vacation days. So for those of you out there who are for whatever reason not using up your vacation days, you've been put on notice. There are several themes that you explore in the book and one of them is cheating. You're a sports fan.
What do you think it is about cheating that we generally find to be so captivating? Well, I came to a conclusion that's probably a bit counterintuitive for most people and quite possibly totally wrong, which is that maybe cheating is really great for sports. And what I mean by that is cheating is really, you know, one step over the line, sometimes, maybe it's five steps, sometimes. But it's one step over the line of really, really wanting to win within the rules, but you want to win so badly that you go beyond.
Right? So what cheating really is a manifestation of desire to win, which is what sports is about. Now, the reason that the ninth circle of hell is reserved for people who cheat to lose, right? You throw games.
And why does that upset us so much? Because it goes against the nature of sport. You don't cheat to lose. You don't throw a game to make money for yourself.
You cheat to win. And so when you look at the obsession we have, if you read the sports pages on a given day, it could be like half the articles are about some form of the rules. So, you know, of cheating depending on what season you're in. So right now my son saw me in these 14, he's a soccer nut.
You won't let me call it soccer. So I'll say football nut. And when you just look at the different, you know, the whole play site, the way football is played on the pitch, you know, flopping would be one of the most drastic forms of it, you know, trying to get away with a foul, trying to pump up a foul, trying to deke and create an offside or avoid one. You know, cheating to, trying to get an advantage, even if it's not quite within the rules, I think we love it.
And then it goes up the ladder all the way to performance enhancing drugs. So we kind of wring our hands and ass, he said it's terrible, it's setting a bad example for kids. On the other hand, you say, first of all, we're fascinated by it. And second of all, you say, man, here's a guy or a gal who so badly wants to kick somebody else's ass that he's willing to put some crazy medicine in him that's going to shrink his testicles and probably, you know, end his life prematurely.
I can get behind that. I love how badly he wants to win. I would want to do it. So I think that we kind of secretly applaud cheating.
You're listening to Motley Fool Money talking to Stephen Dubner. One half of the Freakonomics team, the new book is Winter Rob a Bank and 131 More Warp Suggestions and Well Intended Rants. And it's the well-intended part of your title I want to focus on for a second because one of the things you write about is one of the early blog posts that Stephen Levitt wrote that generated a very quick and very angry response from readers. And it was Levitt posing the question, if you were a terrorist, how would you attack?
Yeah, that was brilliant, wasn't it? So brilliant is one word. Alright, so let me give you a little bit of the context in this. So we had been running our blog for maybe two years or something like that on our own.
Our first book had come out and now we were working on our second book, Super Freakonomics, which actually had a story that involved a pretty complicated algorithm trying to catch terrorists. We were working with a British bank trying to catch terrorists. So we were thinking a lot about terrorism generally. And after we'd had our blog independently for a while, we were asked to bring the blog over to the New York Times and to live on their site, which was, you know, nice for us.
I used to work at the New York Times. It was a nice homecoming. It was a big deal for us. I think it was the first time they brought an outside blog within their site.
And I was asked for an article published, I believe, New York Observer that day, you know, why do you think you guys were the first blog that they were willing to bring in? And my answer was something like, well, you know, because I used to work there, I know their standards and they know us. We'd written a Freakonomics column in the New York Times magazine. And I said, and it's not like we're going to issue a fot-wot or something like that, right?
That's what I said. And then the next day, on the first day of our blog on the New York Times, Levitt writes this post, if you were a terrorist, how would you attack? And it was, I swear to God, a really interesting, thoughtful, thought-provoking, obviously post, basically saying that, you know, there aren't that many bad guys out there. But they can cause real havoc.
So wouldn't it be good to know as much as possible about their possible methodology? Well, if we ask them, they're not going to tell us, even if we know who they are. But why don't we just open, you know, open thread, essentially? Here's a couple ideas of how one might think about creating the optimal terror, the maximum terror for minimal investment, let's say.
But what are some other ideas you might have? So it really was meant to be, you know, I don't know about a public service move, but it was meant to be an open thread that could produce some information and ideas that law enforcement and scholars, researchers and others could think about. But I will say that the majority of our especially brand new readers on the New York Times did not take it that way, Chris. Were you at all surprised by the response?
And did Levitt run this by you before you posted it? Yeah, I mean, honestly, I don't really remember how much now. But back then, I was kind of the de facto editor of the blog, so he would write things, and then I would take a look and maybe edit it a little bit, and then post it. So yeah, so I mean, to this day, I will still absolutely defend every word he wrote in it.
There's nothing quote wrong about it, but it was incendiary because, look, our whole style of thinking is that, yeah, you can get in line and think about it. You can get in line and think the way everybody else does and try to solve problems where everybody else does and come up with the same four ideas everybody else does, even though none of them have worked, or you can really suspend your need to sound quote smart or your need to be quote polite or whatever, and really try to have some new ideas. So I'm all in favor of that. And in terms of the response, whether it surprises, I think what surprises was just the magnitude because, you know, the New York Times website gets a lot of traffic.
It should go without saying, and it was getting so much, not all of it negative, by the way, but getting so much at the times itself, the people who are responsible for kind of shepherding our blog, they just hit the panic button and turned off the comments, which only all that did was it made everybody email to us directly. So one of the things that comes out in this book, I think a little bit more than the previous economics books has to do with your personality, Stephen Levitt's personality, beliefs that you have, interests that you have, and one of the things that comes out that I did not know about you, that comes out loud and clear in this book is boy, you really hate the penny. I mean, if you get the magic wand, you are eliminating the penny from our monetary system. If I get the magic wand, I will definitely eliminate the penny, but only if I have like 20 wishes, and that's number 20, all right.
So I know I sound like an anti-penny zealot, and I am, but only because I don't even know how it got started, Chris. I think I just casually wrote about throwing away pennies when I get the change because who on earth, you know, the penny is just a ridiculous thing. Inflation has rendered it literally almost valueless plus, which we're paying taxes to our government to make the penny, which costs a lot more than a penny to make. And when you look at who are the biggest defenders of the penny, one of the biggest organizations is a group called Americans for Common Sense, C-E-N-T-S, which tells us how great it is for the penny, how great the penny is that children do penny drives to raise a lot of money to which I say, why can't they do a dollar drive and raise more money?
It's the penny, some magical thing. They tell us that if you round up to a nickel, think of how much how much how much how much more expensive things would be for people, which is totally idiotic in my view. And it turns out that the biggest lobbying group for the penny is basically funded by the zinc industry, which supplies the raw material for the penny. So to me, it's a slam dunk.
There's no use. The only reason we still have the penny is because of tradition and inertia. And if you look at other, you know, modern countries, they routinely eliminate their smallest currency that inflation invalidates and why we haven't is beyond me. But I have to say, I've stopped caring.
It was too much. It was too much. It was to care so much about something so stupid was just a waste of my time. So I give up to anybody out there who wants to take up the anti-penny baton, power to you.
You can read everything I've written about. I'll give you some ammunition, but I'm off that train. But it's nice to know that if I'm behind you in line and there's a take up any leave up any, you're not taking it. You're the guy who's only leaving pennies in the little dish.
I'm definitely leaving. I love the leave up any thing because it's stupid to have them, but I'd much rather leave a penny in a bowl than have to throw them away. But I promise you, if you are behind me in the line and I get pennies, I do. I mean, I feel bad about it.
It looks un-American. It looks, you know, it looks crazy. But what I just do is when I get the change, I will put the receipt, if I use cash, I will get the receipt and the change in my hand and I will just sort it. And then I will drop the receipt and the pennies in the bag, which doesn't look so bad.
And then I'll put the silver change in my pocket. Honestly, I throw in nickels too. So I'll throw the nickels and the pennies. I'll leave them in the bag.
And then when I get home and I take out the groceries, the whole bag goes in the trash. But I do put the coins in the recycling because some are good citizens. The book is Winda Rava Bank and 131 More Warp Suggestions and Well-Incended Rants. It's available everywhere, so pick up a copy.
Stephen Dunner, always so good to talk to you. Thanks for being here. Ditto Chris. I really enjoyed it.
Thanks. Thanks very much. Coming up, we'll give you an inside look at the stocks on our radar. This is my The Fool Money.
As always, people in the program are interested in the stocks they talk about and the monthly Fool Make a Formal Recommendations 4 against. So don't buy yourself stocks based solely on what you hear. Welcome back to my money. I'm Chris Hill joining me in Studio One's again, Jason Moser, Matt Arguessinger and Jeff Fisher.
Guys, it's time for the stocks on our radar this week, Matt Arguessinger. What are you looking at and getting ready for Steve Brunette to hit you with a question? Right on. Well, I'm going to take one of Jason's favorites this time around.
I'm going to Twitter, TWTR. Results came out a little while ago, stock got crushed, but gosh, revenue was up 74%. Did with the May weather pack you'll fight for a little bit a week ago. I just think that did sort of disrupt the media landscape around that.
I just think this company either gets new management or gets bought out either way as an investor today. You probably do pretty well. Steve, question about Twitter? I love the concept of one communicating to many in a simple way.
Can you give me a parallel of the business that is doing something like Twitter is also maybe not in the most profitable sense? Wow, Steve. Tough question. You got me stumped there.
One to many businesses that are not profitable outside of Twitter. Gosh, I'm totally stumped. Why don't we throw that out to listeners? Radioitful.com.
If any of you are listening out there, have an idea. Send it in. Jason Moser, what are you looking at? One I'm kicking around for our watch list over at MDP is US Ecology.
ticker is E-C-O-L. This is a little company, just about a $1 billion market cap. It's an interesting business. They treat hazardous waste.
It's a sexy business, Steve. It's something that really gets your attention from the get-go there. But really, that is the attractive part of it. It's just tremendous barriers to entry in this business because it's so regulated, because it's so risky.
They actually handle radioactive material. Bottom line is something that has to happen with that stuff. US Ecology is one of a few that has equipped to handle it. They just made a big acquisition here recently that will offer more services and help grow the business.
It's certainly one that I'm going to be digging further into. Steve, question about US Ecology? Questions more about the market cap, the $1 billion market cap. How small will you look in terms of companies for your comfort level?
My comfort level, typically, I look at like $500 million or bigger. I think that when you start getting under that $500 million number, those are companies that tend to have just a bit more of a tough time engaging in any kind of a manage. Jeff Fisher. Company I've been watching about two years since it went public.
As restoration hardware, tickers are H. They run now six of their new high-end, full-line gigantic gallery stores. They're destinations in and of themselves, and they're really driving higher revenue and higher profits for the company. They plan to open between 60 to 70 of these large stores.
I love that they're turning retail back on its head and saying, hey, a larger store can still work today and it worked very well. Steve? Price points are incredibly high at that store. Every time I've gone in, I don't think I've ever bought anything.
Does anyone buy anything from there? But if I have $3,800 laying around, I guess I mean for a cash, but barring that. They are targeting families that make the top one or two percent of the country. So if you, anyway, they are expensive.
All right, guys, thanks for being here. That's going to do it for this week's edition of Motley Fool Money, our producers, Matt Greer, our engineers, Steve Broido. I'm Chris Hill. We'll see you next week.