Dissenting from the Dissents episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 16, 2026 · 1H 26M

Dissenting from the Dissents

from Amarica's Constitution · host Akhil Reed Amar

How could the vote in Trump v. Barbara have been as close as it was?  Many have been bewildered by the vote in this case, given the strength of the arguments in Chief Justice Roberts' majority opinion, the long history of birthright citizenship, the statutory history, and the clear text of the 14th amendment.  We try to understand this by looking at how the dissents took an aberrant and incorrect approach to the very act of dissenting.  To do this, we have to look at a general theory of dissents at the Supreme Court - and so we do.  Meanwhile, a foreign nation's holiday is celebrated, as well it should be given this nation's role in our own achievement of independence. Lawyers And Judges Are Eligible For Continuing Legal Education Credit by visiting podcast.njsba.com.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 16, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Dissenting from the Dissents

0:00 1:26:45

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Amarica's Constitution?

This episode is 1 hour and 26 minutes long.

When was this Amarica's Constitution episode published?

This episode was published on July 16, 2026.

Can I download this Amarica's Constitution episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!