EPISODE · Mar 20, 2024 · 1H 37M
Dissenting in Concurrence
from Amarica's Constitution · host Akhil Reed Amar
The Trump v. Anderson lead balloon continues to smolder. This episode looks at the areas wherein the concurring Justices took issue with the per curiam, and they are many. Indeed, the three Justices who concurred only in the judgment disagree with the scope of the per curiam as well as its particulars, and their concurrence reads more like a dissent. Can we find areas of agreement with ourselves and the concurrences? What can we learn from all this? CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.
What this episode covers
The Trump v. Anderson lead balloon continues to smolder. This episode looks at the areas wherein the concurring Justices took issue with the per curiam, and they are many. Indeed, the three Justices who concurred only in the judgment disagree with the scope of the per curiam as well as its particulars, and their concurrence reads more like a dissent. Can we find areas of agreement with ourselves and the concurrences? What can we learn from all this? CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.
NOW PLAYING
Dissenting in Concurrence
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Jul 22, 2025 ·55m
Jul 15, 2025 ·47m
Jul 8, 2025 ·61m
Jun 17, 2025 ·43m