EPISODE · Dec 20, 2021 · 47 MIN
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
from SCOTUScast · host The Federalist Society
On December 1, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, on the question of whether all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional. This distinguished panel will review the oral arguments, explore the legal issues involved, and anticipate where the law might be headed.Featuring: - Prof. Daniel Farber, Sho Sato Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley- Prof. Richard W. Garnett, Paul J. Schierl/Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame Law School- Prof. Julia Mahoney, John S. Battle Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law- Prof. Richard Re, Joel B. Piassick Research Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law- Prof. Mary Ziegler, Stearns Weaver Miller Professor, Florida State University College of Law
What this episode covers
On December 1, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, on the question of whether all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional. This distinguished panel will review the oral arguments, explore the legal issues involved, and anticipate where the law might be headed.Featuring: - Prof. Daniel Farber, Sho Sato Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley- Prof. Richard W. Garnett, Paul J. Schierl/Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame Law School- Prof. Julia Mahoney, John S. Battle Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law- Prof. Richard Re, Joel B. Piassick Research Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law- Prof. Mary Ziegler, Stearns Weaver Miller Professor, Florida State University College of Law
NOW PLAYING
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.