Does the Global Security Reporting Program (GSRP) require more scrutiny?

In the wake of allegations made by Mr. Spavor and their implications for Canadian security, this panel delves into the intricacies of the Global Security Reporting Program (GSRP) and whether it requires more accountability and oversight. Artur Wilczynski, Wesley Wark, and Philippe Lagassé discuss Spavor’s allegations against the GSRP, the evolution of the program in the context of emerging global threats, concerns raised regarding transparency and accountability, the difference between foreign intelligence collection and diplomatic reporting, strengthening cooperation between, GSRP, CSIS, and the foreign ministry, as well as the implications for placing the program on a statutory footing.The panel discussed the creation and purpose of the GSRP post-9/11, highlighting its role in providing diplomatic reporting on diverse security issues globally. The diplomatic reporting process involved officers openly engaging with embassy contacts, focusing on country-specific topics. The discussion also delved into allegations by Mr. Spavor and their potential implications for Canadian security. The panel also explored existing accountability and oversight mechanisms, debated the need for statutory changes, and considered the possibility of establishing a Foreign Intelligence Service, emphasizing the importance of defining GSRP's role before determining a legal framework.The CDA Institute is a non-partisan think tank that conducts research and education programming on defence and security.Learn more: CDA Institute