Dr. Phil Renforth and Dr. Mijndert Van der Spek on a harmonized framework for techno-economic analyses and lifecycle assessments of OAE

In this episode of Plan Sea, hosts Anna Madlener and Wil Burns sit down with Dr. Phil Renforth and Dr. Mijndert Van der Spek of Heriot-Watt University to unpack their newly published, harmonized framework for evaluating the viability of ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) pathways. Moving beyond lab-scale assumptions, their approach integrates techno-economic analysis (TEA) and lifecycle assessment  (LCA) to allow the exploration of 54 known OAE variations and how they perform under future, decarbonized energy scenarios. The conversation highlights why real-world data, a cleaner energy grid, and feasibility assessments are important for determining which OAE pathways will deliver results in global scale carbon removal. With any emerging solution, both feasibility and cost must be effectively evaluated. Renforth and Van der Spek combine two essential lenses – techno-economic analysis (TEA) and lifecycle assessment (LCA) – to build a comprehensive picture of OAE’s real potential. TEA determines if a pathway is economically viable and scalable, while LCA screens for its full environmental impacts, not only if it is net-negative, but also whether it engages in “burden shifting,” or solving one problem while creating another. Operating far beyond “carbon balancing,” LCA works across a range of categories, from greenhouse gas emissions to terrestrial and marine acidification, resource use, and pollution. Together, the two tools are meant to provide a level of quantification for decision-makers investigating the viability of any CDR approach. In looking at the framework, Dr. Renforth and Dr. Van der Spek began by introducing  the framework’s structure through a case study of BPMD and its functionality as OAE technology. Rather than offering predictions, the framework helps to show how different technologies perform under current assumptions. This means the framework should not be viewed as forecasting long-term outcomes on its own, but instead as a tool to see how each pathway changes. While these tools are powerful, they are incomplete and alongside rigorous research into the broader social, regulatory, and ethical implications of each potential pathway. For example, LCA aims to measure global stressors by normalizing impacts, but it does not have the ability to detect localized effects. This highlights that any comparison drawn from the framework must be paired with site-specific environmental assessments. Together, these layers of analysis provide a more realistic understanding of where OAE pathways may be within reach. Join us as we dive deeper into this framework and how it aims to spur further evaluation and innovation in OAE by listening to the episode above! Subscribe on your preferred podcast platform and find the entire series here. ACRONYMS / CONCEPTS:CDR: Carbon Dioxide RemovalOAE: ocean alkalinity enhancement TEA: Techno-Economic AnalysisLCA: Lifecycle AssessmentBPMED: Bipolar Membrane ElectrodialysisPlan Sea is a semi-weekly podcast exploring ocean-based climate solutions, brought to you by the Carbon to Sea Initiative & the American University Institute for Responsible Carbon Removal.