E61. "Conscience Cleaners" - Does a criminal need to remember his crime? episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 24, 2022 · 33 MIN

E61. "Conscience Cleaners" - Does a criminal need to remember his crime?

from Philosophy | Ethics Short Story Discussions · host Kolby Granville

Philosophy | Ethics Short Story Magazine: Code “Happy” for 12 Issues/$4.95! https://www.afterdinnerconversation.com/subscribe/yearlyNamed “Top 20 Philosophy Podcast” for 2022!STORY SUMMARY: Should a criminal suffering from the remorse of the crime he committed be permitted to be freed of that pain? In this work of philosophical short story fiction, Mr. Henmore’s was convicted of a terrible crime many years ago. He served his time, and been paroled, and is genuinely remorseful for what he did. In fact, his pain is so great, even years later, he suffers severe, almost daily, mental anguish from the knowledge of what he did. His lawyer has gone before the Grand Rectification Council to ask permission to have Mr. Henmore’s memory wiped clean of the crime he committed so as to enter his suffering. After making his case on behalf of his client, it is now up to the Council, should Mr. Henmore forever remember the horrible thing he has done?DISCUSSION: A hard story that caused us to go back and forth several times. First, can we really be sure that erasing the memory of the crime won’t alter the person so as to make it more likely they will commit the crime in the future? If we are absolutely sure of that, is there an argument to be made that the punishment of remembering the crime you committed should last forever? Counterpoint, does society have a duty to create useful people of those who are safe to integrate into society? And finally, from an emotional standpoint, don’t you want the person to committed the crime, simply to suffer with the knowledge of what they did? Lots of questions in this Gordian Knot of a story, but very few clear ethical answers. BOOK LINK: Download the accompanying short story here.COMPANION PODCAST: Listen to our audiobook readings of After Dinner Conversation short stories (“Philosophy | Ethics Short Story Audiobooks”).MAGAZINE: Sign up for our monthly magazine and receive short stories that ask ethical and philosophical questions. Use the discount code on our website to get the first month free or an entire year for just $4.95!SUPPORT: Support us on Patreon.FOLLOW: Twitter, Instagram, Facebook

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jan 24, 2022

Embed this episode

“Does a criminal need to remember his crime?” Kolby and Jeremy discuss the philosophy and ethics of crime and justice in the short story, “Conscience Cleaners" by Alexander B. Joy.

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

E61. "Conscience Cleaners" - Does a criminal need to remember his crime?

0:00 33:12

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Philosophy | Ethics Short Story Discussions?

This episode is 33 minutes long.

When was this Philosophy | Ethics Short Story Discussions episode published?

This episode was published on January 24, 2022.

Can I download this Philosophy | Ethics Short Story Discussions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!