ELB Podcast Episode 6. Nate Persily: Can the Supreme Court Handle Social Science In Election Cases? episode artwork

EPISODE · Nov 7, 2015 · 30 MIN

ELB Podcast Episode 6. Nate Persily: Can the Supreme Court Handle Social Science In Election Cases?

from ELB Podcast · host Rick Hasen

Can the Supreme Court handle social science evidence in election law cases? Will lack of good data determine the outcome of the Supreme Court's upcoming one person, one vote decision in Evenwel v. Abbott? What role will and should evidence play in assessing questions such as the constitutionality of McCain-Feingold's soft money ban or Texas's strict voter identification law. On Episode 6 of the ELB Podcast, we talk to law professor and political scientist Nate Persily of Stanford Law School, one of the country’s leading redistricting and election law experts.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Nov 7, 2015

Embed this episode

Ready to play

ELB Podcast Episode 6. Nate Persily: Can the Supreme Court Handle Social Science In Election Cases?

0:00 30:12

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of ELB Podcast?

This episode is 30 minutes long.

When was this ELB Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on November 7, 2015.

Can I download this ELB Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!