EP 22 Back in the Saddle

EP 22: Back in the Saddle | The JudgMental PodcastShow NotesChristine is back! In this episode, Christine and Hugh reunite to discuss the latest in family law, courtroom culture, and the ongoing fight for due process. Broadcasting remotely, Christine shares her experiences from Florida and California, drawing comparisons to Kentucky’s legal landscape.Key Topics Covered:Christine’s return and remote podcasting updateFlorida’s strict bar rules and the impact on attorney speechKentucky vs. Florida: Free speech, legal culture, and the First AmendmentRecap of the Louisville CLE (Continuing Legal Education) for family lawAdair v Emberton: What it means for FOC (Friend of the Court) testimonyCan attorneys waive client rights without consent? Panel debates and analogies to Miranda rightsThe chaos of motion hour and the importance of due processThe role of FOCs and GALs (Guardians ad Litem) in family courtPublished vs. unpublished opinions: Why it matters and what’s changingWhite v Cole: The “invoking the rule” basics and courtroom fundamentalsConcerns about transparency, open courts, and the future of Louisville’s family court systemChristine’s reflections on California’s court system and the dangers of gaslighting parentsNotable Quotes:“If you think you’re going to tell me what to say, how to say it, when to say it, or to whom to speak, you have the wrong girl.”“It’s a court of law. I just don’t understand the amount of time wasted by them on this when they don’t even read motions.”“The system, in my opinion, is in real trouble.”Resources & Links:Website: judge-y.comChristine on TikTok/Instagram: @KentuckyChristineYouTube & Instagram: @judge-yConnect with Us:We want to hear your stories! Share your experiences, questions, or feedback in the comments or reach out on social media.Thank you for listening to The Judgmental Podcast. Don’t forget to subscribe, leave a review, and join us next time for more candid legal talk!