EP 23 Hiding the Ball

Episode 23: Hiding the BallIn this episode of the Judgmental Podcast, Christine and Hugh dive deep into recent changes in family court transparency, focusing on the controversial new policies around motion hour recordings and pre-rulings. They discuss the impact of these changes on attorneys, litigants, and the public, raising concerns about access, accountability, and the growing lack of transparency in the judiciary.Key topics include:The end of emailing pre-rulings to attorneys and the challenges this creates for legal teams and clients.The high cost and limited access to full motion hour recordings, and what this means for public oversight.The broader implications for pro se litigants and the media, and the potential chilling effect on judicial accountability.A candid discussion about the culture of protectionism within the judiciary, drawing parallels to issues in law enforcement.Listener stories and national perspectives on family court reform, including problematic practices in custodial evaluations.A spotlight on recent motions to disqualify certain evaluators, and the systemic issues these cases reveal.Christine and Hugh also share personal experiences, listener feedback, and their ongoing commitment to advocating for transparency and fairness in the family court system.Tune in for a passionate, insightful conversation that pulls back the curtain on the realities of family law and judicial reform.Resources & Links:Submit your stories: judge-y.comFollow Christine: @KentuckyChristine on all platformsFollow the show: @judge-y on YouTube, Instagram, TikTok