EP 27 If you think that's bad ... episode artwork

EPISODE · Oct 7, 2025 · 35 MIN

EP 27 If you think that's bad ...

from The JudgeMental Podcast

The JudgeMental Podcast – EP 27: "If you think that's bad ..."Hosts: Hugh & ChristineEpisode Summary:Hugh and Christine, the minds behind Judge-y, discuss judicial accountability, transparency, and the latest drama in the courts.The episode centers on a recent motion to recuse Judge Santry in Jefferson County, sparked by her attendance at a partisan campaign event and the resulting appearance of bias.The hosts break down the legal and ethical implications, including the judge’s defensive response, the role of the guardian ad litem, and the standards for judicial impartiality in Kentucky.They reflect on the changing landscape of the local legal community, the influx of new attorneys, and the challenges facing both lawyers and litigants in family court.The conversation expands to the broader issues of court appointments, the financial incentives for GALs and FOCs, and the need for reform in how children are represented in divorce cases.Hugh and Christine share personal anecdotes about courtroom dynamics, the impact of political associations on judicial perception, and the importance of keeping the judiciary nonpartisan.The episode wraps up with a call for listeners to submit their stories and stay tuned for updates on the Judge-y app.Key Topics:Motion to recuse Judge Santry: facts, reactions, and legal standardsThe appearance of bias and judicial ethicsThe role and compensation of GALs and FOCs in KentuckyThe evolving legal community post-pandemicGender dynamics and professionalism in the courtroomThe dangers of politicizing the judiciaryCalls for transparency, reform, and community engagementNotable Quotes:“The appearance of a conflict is enough.”“Judges have to be impartial and nonpartisan.”“Children do not need an hourly rate attorney in their parents’ divorce.”“The judiciary is supposed to be non-political.”Connect with Judgy:Submit your stories at Judge-y.comFollow on YouTube and Instagram: @judgingthejudges, @judge-yChristine: @KentuckyChristineThank you for listening! Stay tuned for app updates and more candid conversations about the legal system.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 7, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

EP 27 If you think that's bad ...

0:00 35:38

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The JudgeMental Podcast?

This episode is 35 minutes long.

When was this The JudgeMental Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on October 7, 2025.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this The JudgeMental Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!