Ep. 304: Dworkin v. Hart on Legal Judgment (Part One) episode artwork

EPISODE · Nov 14, 2022

Ep. 304: Dworkin v. Hart on Legal Judgment (Part One)

from The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast · host Mark Linsenmayer

Subscribe to get parts 1 and 2 of this now, ad-free. On Ronald Dworkin's "The Model of Rules" (1967) and Scott J. Shapiro's "The 'Hart-Dworkin' Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed" (2007). How do judges make decisions in hard cases? When the law doesn't definitively decide an issue, do judges just draw on their personal moral judgments? Dworkin says no, that moral principles are built into the legal principles which guide judges, even if these principles are not written out in legal rules. The post Ep. 304: Dworkin v. Hart on Legal Judgment (Part One) first appeared on The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Nov 14, 2022

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Ep. 304: Dworkin v. Hart on Legal Judgment (Part One)

0:00 0:00

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was this The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on November 14, 2022.

Can I download this The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!