Ep 325: Discussion | Location Location Location: Alternatives to "Street" Epistemology

Location: Nashville, Tennessee Recorded: 23 March 2019 Released: 2 April 2019 Watch video of the panel discussion here: https://youtu.be/IAMY1zwz3Ho Please follow the moderator and panelists on Twitter: Anthony Magnabosco: https://twitter.com/magnabosco Nichole Terry: https://twitter.com/SkepticNikki Bob Swanson: https://twitter.com/Mortgage_Hill Todd Yoder https://twitter.com/tyoder61 Dr. Tyrone Wells: https://twitter.com/5minChat Summary: Nichole Terry (Twitter), Todd Yoder (Recovering from Religion Helpline), Bob Swanson (Classrooms), and Dr. Tyrone Wells (Public Parks and Campuses) discuss their experiences and thoughts when using Street Epistemology in a variety of different venues. Moderated by Anthony Magnabosco. The panelists address questions submitted by the SE Community and live audience members at NaNoCon 2019. Skip ahead to a desired point in the talk (Add 35 seconds to these timestamps to account for podcast intro): -- Introduction: 00:09 Meet the Panelists: 00:32 NaNoCon19 Hashtag: 02:20 Definition of SE: 02:35 -- Panel Question 1: 02:53 "What's required for a SE talk to be "effective" or "successful"?" Panel Question 2: 08:12 "What is your underlying goal when having an SE talk?" Panel Question 3: 13:04 "What's the worst that could happen from SE conversation?" Panel Question 4: 17:31 "How do you respond when your interlocutor says something wildly inaccurate?" Panel Question 5: 22:22 "Would you share one of your most interesting talks with us?" Panel Question 6: 27:44 "What criteria (if any) do you use to decide who to talk with?" -- Audience Question 1: 25:41 "How do you think it is different for a woman to do Street Epistemology?" Audience Question 2: 30:30 "I am sometimes guilty of being the "angry atheist" in online debates. Is there any benefit to this, perhaps to third parties, or does the harm outweigh any benefit?" Audience Question 3: 33:56 "Do you have any advice for political SE talks? It seems like a key point in religious SE talks is getting down to faith and breaking that methodology down. Is there a similar key point or backbone to political discussions?" Audience Question 4: 36:30 "Do these techniques work as well with close friends or family, or do you think being an impartial stranger helps?" Audience Question 5: 40:29 "Has anyone in an SE session every challenged you to to change your belief about something or doubt your settled belief?" -- Audio correction provided by Philipp Grzemba. Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel. Links to References in Video: 01:53 | Tyrone's NaNoCon 2019 talk: LINK COMING SOON 02:03 | Tyrone using ASL with his cat: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtax-4T9Mls 19:18 | Bob's YouTube Channel Mortgage Hill Musings: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQU9GcG93HyDa4oV_TbO9vQ 24:37 | Anthony's talk with Noella and Hafsa: https://youtu.be/qA4Vkn3iJi0 26:33 | Anthony's talk with Luanne: https://youtu.be/vd25PCyiwaM 27:48 | Linda Mokko's YouTube Channel Super Curious: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHjS3k0leQwe7nOKXFKAKjw ** Add foreign language captions w/YouTube's community contributions tools ** Mistakes: Please let me know if you spot any. The theme of this year's NaNoCon was Sapiens = Human Wisdom Recorded by and used with permission from Nashville Nones: https://nashvillenones.com/ Edited w/PowerDirector. The views addressed here are mine and mine alone, and are not necessarily shared by members of my family and friends.