I. V. M. M.
M. M. They're probably thinking maybe if I disguise his questions as good morning forwards, he may finally learn them and abandon his Godforsick and advertising job and complete that BSE. Very, very possible.
I have a question here. This is your Robert Frost preference. So do you think one day in class, right now they analyze poems and all that? So do you think one day he'll actually analyze one for words?
Because that is the cultural, what's the phrase, milieu? What are the French words of this generation? Sometimes you really wish they would carry the analogy towards logical. Speed is calculated miles per hour, life is calculated at a smile per hour.
And there's one place called Sharp Eisclinic, which probably counts as success in Pines per hour. So, that would be like so profound. I'm like, this is complicated, I'm a sense of my city. So now without looking at a computer screen, what is the equation of speed, young shi?
The Keanu Reeves plus Sandra Bullock equal to Buzz Goes Boom. You're hopeless. And even, I'm seeing this forward that you've sent. And even though the image of the forward as a young white girl standing in front of a European meadow, it's almost a whitenish in its demeanor.
It is a quintessentially Indian forward. Why so, Chuck? Because only in India would be so concerned about mileage even when it comes to smiles. We will squeeze the maximum out of even happiness like the final drops in a packet of Amrass.
We are talking about a country that actually puts toothpaste tubes between doors. So, he's got to squeeze out. Very true. Anyway, speaking about Indian summers, those Aussie cricket fellows couldn't even take the march heat.
And I've folded to the Indian cricket test team who have completed a historic and superb two-one test cricket win. Today, yes, very good. But anyway, the Aussies were so eager to run off from India that the last match finished a full day and a half early. The Aussies were like this heat is totally not worth it.
Might. And I believe this is this magical thing called Amrass for lunch. Screw the skid crad business. And the series had everything.
Skill, talent, tension, but above all drama. Since a certain very special Hyderabadi gentleman decided to make Biryani out of an Aussie attack in Eden Gardens in an epic comeback victory, India, Australia have always been spicy affairs. I noticed you people are insiduously garnishing this entire podcast at Kaji Food, Macavas, Amrass, Biryani and whatever. Is this an underhanded trick to take me to abandon my diet or what?
I think that food is banned in the studio very much so. So I'm on a diet as everyone knows and sometimes it becomes really... So sometimes you stoop to crime. So yesterday, today this morning we had a bunch of visitors at work.
And so yesterday our guys had very thoughtfully procured of Biryani Agud Devaschitz. And for safekeeping, they were kept in my office. Not safekeeping, otherwise we are very in factly right? So, infested with the right.
That's no way to call your workers. I don't know any other listen to the podcast. No, no. Did you play it as an under-re-five for a soundtrack in your factory?
Because you have a silly attrition problem. So yesterday evening it was a particularly difficult time. I was really, I was really, I had no nothing to eat because policy... I've decided...
So victim of your own policy? Yeah, I had to call this between a good day. So I decided to take one. I was going to miss one.
It turns out that these champs had basically got one per guy who was with it. Oh, you? So this morning, yeah, this morning, there was one shot. And...
One shot. And all these turncoats looked at me, boss. I don't know how they were going. Anyway, I don't know where I was going with this whole thing.
She started us one day with her diet. So anyway, why all this cricket talks only? Because the topic of this week's podcast is one of the most interesting and controversial innovations to enter the world of cricket. The DRS, or to use its full Christian name as Takud put it, the umpiring decision review system or UDRs.
Because everyone is milking the controversy from the UDRs of the cricketing cow. That's terrible chuck even by your standards. I could even just call them standards. True.
But let me leave my cards on the table. I'm quite the cricket illiterate. And the extent of my cricketing knowledge and intersections of who wins, what comes about it. So I'm running the Tadejameem and the choice utterances by Coley of CNBC.
Who was an open and female relative. I know, I was just chatting up with Shikit before he started recording. And he told me about, you know, I must tell my audience that they don't consider me a cricketing brain. So very patronizingly told me, you know, what is the game called cricket?
And there's something called DRS, we're going to talk about it. You're going to be part of it. I said, okay, cool. And so I remembered this cousin of Bayern.
And whenever he was children, he was my best friend. And he was strange. So one of the things he used to do, we were like four or five, I don't remember. He had steel sugar from the kitchen and not eat it.
What he would do is he would put it on the floor and then wait till the ants got there. And then both of us would lie on the floor. He'd also make me do it. And wait for the ants to just watch the ants come pick up the grains and go.
And ants are like, you know, extremely busy. So they come rushing in. And then they sort of talk to each other with their ancienae and then they take it and go there randomly. But they're extremely busy.
They're like, actually, they're doing anything. But they're like, I'm going here and all. And this guy grows up to me with a cricket fan. So there's some metaphor in there.
So that's my question. So he got back at me. I must confess to my listeners also. So he says, so I met up with him after a long time.
He's come down. He says, what is your favorite game now? And I said, chess. And he had a laugh because he remembered a cricket thing.
And he told me that he had a friend who took up chess because he found his day job too fast for him. And what was his day job? He was a meditation teacher. So apparently, he was even with me.
But let's simplify this thing called DRS. For even the cricketing agnostics out there because you never know where my company group discussion was in interview. So the reason why DRS exists is because there are a few fundamental truths in life. Death, taxes and sports fans disagreeing with Sineffi or umpiring decisions.
And being human, not the Salman Khan t-shirts kind of way, but who are the homo sapiens sapiens. Ampires are prone to making errors. And with technology enabling us to examine the sport closer, there is a constant attempt to minimize these errors. And cricket was one of the first sports to use TV replays to settle decisions.
The use of the third umpire to decide to run out in Stumpings started in 1992. And the first batsman to be given out run out by the third umpire was? Satchin. That's correct.
No. The question is the right answer to everything. He's like 42. No.
One of the questions. All cricketing answers are the same. Yeah. The first one was the best bowling in Javat Lalal Nehru Stadium in Kuchin.
Yeah. Yeah. Astute. Yes.
The Tinduka was given a run out by third umpire Karl Leibenburg of the Fielding of the legendary South African Fielder, John T. Rhodes. No better person to have affected the first ever run out by, to be given out by the umpire. At the paltry, non-satchin Tindukarian score of 11.
And after that kind of start, no wonder the BCI hit snake. That's true. It's like after I am on the realise that Chetan Bhagat has won. I look like he stopped all the English courses.
He's not really working out for us. No, it's not. Anyway, the third umpire was the only form of cricket for the better part of two decades. Strangely, it was because everything else seems to have progressed.
It's a huge rate. But it didn't even begin to reduce umpiring decision errors in cricket. Yeah. Most of the errors happened on decisions whether the ball had hit the bat for catches or whether the ball was in line to hit the stems for like before we hit.
And these could not be solved by simple TV replays. At this point, I must apologize to anybody here, any of our American German Dutch listeners. Apparently, there are a few. But can't these fellows come to an amicable settlement?
You know, what we used to do when you were playing cricket monk friends. See, do you have a heart attack on the other side? No, no, no. You have a heart attack on the other side.
I'm just trying to imagine Virat calling in action to your argument. In the barrage of the above mentioned kind words and middle fingers would be understandable. Imagine also how the scorecards would change. Dismissed by pleading.
He may not be convincing. Mother called. This is because I like your building fellows. Professional cricket was not as easily convinced.
Sorry. Which is why the others were tested in India versus Sri Lanka match in 2008 and officially introduced in a New Zealand was Pakistan match in 2009. But what is this DR? What does it do?
And at this point, we will take a little break now. So we will satiate your curiosity as well as a curiosity of all our listeners as well as the ICC themselves who probably haven't been on our own doing this thing works after this very short break. Be right back. It feels like everyone is talking about two things right now.
Pickleball and podcast. So what happens when someone who's lived her whole life on the court decides to bring those two girls together? I'm Sanya Mirzam and I'm bringing you a brand new podcast. Serving it up with Sanya.
I've had some incredible conversations with friends, fellow athletes, artists and entrepreneurs. Each episode starts with a game of pickleball and once the rallies are done, the real topic is. Serving it up with Sanya, watch and listen on YouTube and wherever you get your favorite podcasts. Namaste sashyakal.
Good morning. Evening afternoon. My podcast is Sanya Sanya Sanya. No topic and no filter is safe from further approach.
That's me Monday to Friday, Sunday, Sunday, and we love kids. We chat with servants who will never meet traffic jams on the streets and people from all professions. Every Monday I go live with the show, ask me anything, AMA, you tell the questions, I know better than a Mumbai rich chat driver. I even host a panel discussion called Cock and Bull where we dive into current affairs and wonder why anyone even cares at all.
And Friday releases are always surprise episodes for you all. So tune into CyberSayers on YouTube and all our new streaming platforms. Welcome back to Simplified. We are talking about the decision review system or the DRS which is the decision system in cricket which is causing a lot of controversy these days.
And before we went to the break, Narayini had asked what DRS comprises of. So DRS is actually a combination of three different technologies to help an empire make his decision. They are the Hawkeye for ball-tracking, the sneaker meter or ultra-h for listening for slide edges and nicks and the hotspot for determining ball impact. That sounded like word salad to me.
Okay, okay, okay. So let's take this one second time. The Hawkeye is the oldest among these technologies. He does invent it in the UK via fellow fittingly of named Paul Hawkins, not of Kukar fame.
The system works via six or seven high performance cameras, normally positioned on the underside of the stadium roof. So now we know there's another thing that has an underside. Which tracks the ball from different angles. The video from the six cameras is then triangulated and combined to create a three-dimensional representation of the trajectory of the ball.
Triangulation. It's the same thing that's used in GPS, isn't it? Three satellites determining your position on the line. Yeah, exactly.
Hawkeye does the same to predict the height spin and trajectory of the ball. This is usually used to determine leg before we get or LBRU. That is whether the ball would have hit the stance unless the batsman decided to block it with his pad. And this is something not unique to Jessica cricket.
It's used in tennis as well, where it's used to verify whether the ball has gone out of the line. Yeah, I mean, also Hawkeye is not infallible, but it is accurate to up to five millimeters or point one nine inch. But it's generally tested as an impartial second opinion in sport. And I used to dispute cleanball cars even if you clearly see the ball just imprint on the wall.
Yes, and moving on to the second technology in DRS, the synchometer, which is a acoustic marble. Invented by the English computer scientist Alan Plaskat, it analyzes the sound patterns picked up by the stump microphone. stump microphone. Yeah, so basically if the ball has hit the bat, then you see a huge spike.
I love the stump microphone. Apart from helping good decision, I mean that's the secondary objective. The primary objective of the stump microphone is to capture on field utterances by creators. Yeah, Tony has been the master of wit behind the wickets.
Like when Scolding is bowler for not spinning the ball because he had placed JITA SHWUJAR in the slips. He said, yeah, GUMEGA ISILLIAB UJARAKA IZARAKA IZARAKA IZARAKA IZARAKA IZARAKA IZARAKA IZARAKA There are other gems as well. I'm not sure how many of these have picked up by stump microphones, but they are worth a mention in any case. My favorite story is when English all down to James Ormond walked out to the pitch.
There was Mark Waugh, he was playing against the England playing against Australia at that time. So Mark was said, Dan Gukuit is mate, you're not even good enough to play for Surrey, so what are you doing here? Play for England. So James Ormond without any hesitation looked at him and said, maybe not, but it is not the best player in my family.
He was great. So Glenn McGrath, he was also notorious for slacking. So this is a mob player, who was a little stout. And Glenn McGrath goes to him and then he misses something like that.
And Glenn McGrath runs the right of his head. You become so fat or something like that. How come you so fat? So he said every time I screw your life, he gives me a kiss.
I'm not sure. He's in the slip just very well. I'm not sure whether the protagonist was Glenn McGrath, but he's a very awesome one, which is not part of any of these compilations. I found some Reddit.
And this was actually the stump mic had a very integral role to play in this. So Channel 9 in Australia was broadcasting, I think the domestic matches, no, it's the domestic matches in Aussie home games. And Gilchrist wanted the company to switch off the stump mics between overs, because they would discuss strategy and all that and they didn't want the strategy leaking out. So he made this play, but the company refused to switch it off.
So what he did was, and this is genius on Gilchrist part, he stood up to the stump and he started name dropping sponsor names at work, competitors to the sponsors of that game. Amazing. It was amazing. So it was amazing.
So it was amazing. He would talk about it over for Shreps apparently. He would have thought he would talk about some other car. This is the line on Reddit.
Channel 9 very quickly found by the mute, but it was. I love this story. Amazing. But anyway, coming back to the technology, which is the sneaker meter, it gives a graphical representation of the sound of what the ball hit.
The raw sound is cleaned up to remove ambient noise by filtering. What is displayed on the screen is what you see on an oscilloscope or in a piece of music technology software. If the ball hits nothing, the sneaker graph shows nothing. If the ball hits the bat, then the wood of the bat vibrates to create a clean sharp spike and a short sound is heard.
If the bad or glove is hit, the impact is spread over a longer period of time. And with no wood to cleanly resonate the graph, it is flatter. When more than one sound, say for example, the bat hits the ground and then what they do is they synchronize the audio plots with those slow more replays. So they can figure out what exactly it was.
So what caused with sound? There is a technology in mechanical engineering where you can, I very very demure collected it, but you can make out cracks in metal based on if you put an impact on how the sound travels through it. So there also a sound spectrum is analyzed and it is not like ultrasound. There is ultrasound which is different.
Ultrasound is echoing and so there are discontinuities. This was another one I demure collect from engineering days. The transferred wave of sound goes through the material and then if there is any discontinuity it gives a change in the spectrum. So the biggest crack in metal is Ozzy Osbourne.
Ozzy Osbourne. My favorite quote is of all the things I have lost, I miss my mind the most. I am wondering if the mic is coming from the final tech component of the DRS is the hotspot, the use of infrared to determine ball impact. And this is the most complex piece of technology.
In fact, it was primarily used for jet tracking and radar technology. Kind of how technology go use goes from the high importance to the trivial. Internet was initially developed as a military intelligence network and now it is used to see that video in smartphone. I think hardcore cricket fans would disagree with you on the branding of cricket as trivial.
What can we do? Exactly. Anyway, so hotspot uses to infrared cameras positioned at either end of the ground. These cameras sense and measure heat from friction generated by collisions such as a ball on pad, ball on pad, ball on ground or ball on glove.
On Kohli, on Smith. That's not a bit friction. They are all white. They are just white.
A black and white negative image of the incident is generated into a computer which shows the ball's precise point of contact. And now with ultra edge, a hybrid of the sneaker and hotspot. So what they do is they put the two together. The most microscopic of the edges are identified for decisions.
One of the legends like Bradman and Richard, Wigand Richard and such would hold their esteemed records in the age of DRS. You know, like on that last note. Like I don't know if you remember the story. I'm just remembering random cricket stories as you say things.
Before all these names you mentioned, there was a legend of an English by a small WG Grace. So WG Grace was notoriously pompous and cochier. I'm sure actual cricket scores are very different from what happened. Like I mean what got recorded in visten is very different from what actually happened on ground.
So apparently one story goes that he was clean bold and he coolly picked up the bales and put them back on. And the umpire sheepish and he was a towering person. So nobody had the balls to go and tell him to f*** off. Umpire Mika Kavan said, hey listen, you're out.
And WG Grace said back. He pointed the crowd and said, they've come to see me bad. Not to see you umpire. I've heard another version of this.
So apparently WG Grace gets beaten and the ball just flicks the bales off. And that's it. I just, you know, it doesn't knock the storms over anything like that. And it's a windy day.
So WG Grace tells the umpire. Windy day isn't it umpire. So the umpire says, indeed, Dr. Grace, I hope it doesn't blow your hat off on your way back to the pavilion.
Oh! Why is it since you're talking WG Grace? This is author called Arthur Corndoyle who happened to play first class match and he took one wicket and then one wicket was WG Grace. Wow!
Wow! What a badass. WG Grace is wicket and Roachola. Amazing.
Yeah, but hotspot technology which we are talking about in this entire space. It's super expensive though. It's $6,000 per day for the use of two cameras or $10,000 per day for the use of four cameras. That's roughly around 6.5 lakh rupees per day.
Per day. Per day. Not per test. No, but it's per day.
So into five. I think that would be really happy this last year's go to the end of day. Actually, one thing that's probably the opposite of something that's paid for that. It's pretty late.
Yeah. So 6.5 lakhs a day? Is this seems expensive to us, pleb, who thinks that one thing that's expensive is a pocket change in the DC? All this sounds very impressive.
So why is it controversial? This must solve all decision problems. Unfortunately, no Narraine. Since the technology is implemented and interpreted by humans, plenty of new problems are created.
It's like this whole joke about tech support, one fellow calls tech support and unable to switch on his computer. After spending ages to help, trying to give that fellow simple instructions, the concentro fellow finally gave up and he's like, sir, I've figured out the problem. It lies between the computer and the chair. So on that note, let's take a short break.
We'll be right back after this break. Stick around. Are you looking for finance products and services that can enhance your personal finance experience? Are you looking for a space to talk about your financial product or service?
And are you looking for a Chris Rock Show where the conversation is all about money? Well, your search ends here. Hi, my name is Arupak Gupta and I post all the best of the podcast and I invite you for the conversation about your personal finance on each Monday on the IBM podcast app or the website or at any podcast streaming platforms. See you folks.
You know that feeling when you finish a movie and you just need to talk about it, that desperate need to discuss why Kahluna Ho hits different. Enter IBM's brand new podcast, Sennify. It's streaming and current just yapping over Hindi cinema every Friday. ROMcom's director will debut Scariot Defining Moments, whatever they're vibing with, they're breaking it down.
Join the podcast on IBM Pub's YouTube or any audio streaming platform. Caution, you'll want to re-watch everything after listening to us. Come join us on Sennify. And welcome back to part three of the time with Sreekeet, Dharin and Chuk.
Also known as Sibil Vai. We're talking about DRS or the decision review system and Camo Milti with the pinky sticky. And so we talked about the technology in DRS and the impressive camera, camera, microphone, and all the cost involved. But still, as with all things, I mean it doesn't matter how much, how many good things you have, it's not enough and there are problems with it, we find problems with everything.
I have a serious question when you have a speaker, how often is it because someone's been having sex on it? What? This is probably the ground-skid-round. It's meant to not reveal something like that.
I'm not sure. It reminds me of that stupid old joke. What is the main difference between men's cricket and women's cricket? What?
Don't tell me you guys don't know. First time, they love it. Yeah, yeah. So men's cricket has a short leg between two long legs.
You and women's cricket has a gully between two five legs. Five legs. Seven centred me was cracking up a lot after six. These are the special...
Ten times of producing making was how do we censor this house? Okay, it's okay. It's not just the seven centred you. I think 32 years old he was also quite abused.
Anyways, problems with the DRS. So the biggest problem with the DRS is that not every decision can be reviewed without inordinately long breaks in play, which will make cricket a five day long game even more tedious than it already is. Wow, good you guys are admitting that. I've known road construction was a more exciting.
Each team may make no more than two unsuccessful, review requests per AT over the test match and no more than one unsuccessful review request for innings during an ODI. So basically if you've got your review long you've blown it. Yeah, you've blown it for the rest of the innings. I love the way they write cricket rules.
It's almost like a legal book. If you're enough of the cricket rule book, you're certified lawyer to no-tiver. Which means automatically there is a whole new strategizing component of when to call for reviews and when not to. So it's not...
the technology is constantly running, but you have to think about when to utilize it or not. Is that a layer of complexity which needs to be very much so... Not just complexity, there is also another thing where... He very astutely said that DRS has brought a preferential treatment of so to say a caste system into the game.
Where batsman higher up the order who are better or captains can use a review over the lower order batsman who can't really. Or like an experience batman over a new batsman. Over and over a new batman too. Yeah, exactly.
And similarly strike bowlers have a bigger influence to use DRS over part timers. This makes the game which is supposed to give everyone equal chance of playing and equal benefits of umpiring. For that matter, the notoriously bad Chris Martin has an equal chance of scoring a central year to be a video of innings as maybe a certain that we could ask. And this suddenly brings this whole preferential treatment to play that if you're a better batsman you have better chance of getting a DR.
Versus a poorer batman. So apart from this caste system as it were, the technology itself, like the theoretical technology itself is not 100% accurate. Especially with Hawkeye which is ultimately an assumption of trajectory. In fact the Hawkeye officials themselves admitted in December 2014 that their review technology made an error in a decision to give Pakistan open up Shahan Masood out in the second test against New Zealand in Dubai.
And I remember myself like long back when Hawkeye was still a thing at least on broadcast. This was during the India England series in 2002. Almost immediately after the epic India Australia series. This is the one in India one in England after so long.
This is a test where David scored that incredible 148 and such and Gangri also scored centuries. That epic match. Where Gangri had the balls to put the team into the bowling. I remember that very quickly.
And I forget who was the bowler, which Indian was bowling. It was very clearly out of LBW. I mean you look at it and you know it's LBW. And bowler knew it, the batsmen knew it, the umpire immediately razed his finger without any hesitation.
And there was a DR in those days but they would show Hawkeye after the LBW. It was just for the spender. And shockingly enough that was missing the top of the off-stump very clearly. And there were two commentators.
One of them was surprised. The other one was Namjur Sidhu who was like I remember his words very. Oh that is so plump that is incredible. I'm a wicked foreign.
Oh Hawkeye be damned. I told you it never works. But even though that was so telling that there are some things that technology gets wrong that the human eye intuitively gets right. I don't know.
In which case what is correct over here? See one more assumption is that you have seen technology involved. The reason why technology is getting involved is because there is a margin of error that umpire has. Now if there is still a margin of error and technology is involved then you can buy both of the whole thing.
Like let's just go with the umpiring. One other flaw in this whole thing is that it is a technology which can never be by definition, never be validated experimentally. You can't do it. So it is always going to be an opinion opinion opinion.
That's all it is going to be. They take it and then they finally make a call on that basis. And the thing about cheating also. So I don't know much about DRs but didn't the Australian fellow ask the dressing room if to take a review.
There was some who have our... That was Steve Smith, Smarmy Ozzy Captain who tried to ask his better informed dressing room bodies while accessing his place if he should take a review. That was a no no right? Absolutely no no.
This incident caused the otherwise phlegmatic BCCI to have a moment of victory when they said DR is equal to dressing room reviews. It was a lot of Facebook. Anyway Coley charged it Smith yelling at him. Like he had eaten his favourite dessert that he had been saving in the office for his gender.
He was saying thanks mate it was delicious. And Coley must have caught my dear fellow. I'm like I'm just going to say old chap. You may have it mistaken.
Anyway and finally at the end of it all there is the ethos of it. It just disrupts the flow of the game. Everyone is like standing around waiting for some light to go off somewhere. And as former Empire Dicky Bird said it undermines the authority of the on-field umpires.
At the end of the day you either get rid of them altogether. Otherwise they are always like okay if my decision is overturned then I feel like okay I'm not good enough. It puts that additional pressure on the umpires. So this is almost like an other argument.
Although I don't think this argument has been made too much. It's like an other example of AI taking over jobs. Yeah exactly. And the flow and authority argument is so strong that football, the most popular game on the planet, has stayed away from video refering altogether.
Because they are like you know what cricket actually has a game. It's full of interruptions anyway. So therefore it is more amenable to this kind of technology coming into place. Football is the flow of it.
It's the flow of it. It's entirely on the flow because momentum is very important in football. You are playing one side is playing very well. If you keep stopping the game all the time then it will always be a problematic thing in there.
I'm going to watch football. All this technology value. Let the ball brush against the bat and much more energy to kick. And just to clarify for American listeners when we say football we are talking about the actual football.
Just so that I can define football to you which is beautifully defined. It's a game where 22 people chase a ball around the pitch for 90 minutes and in the end the Germans win. Or Chelsea. On that note we have some very interesting cricketing terminologies and etymologies of the words of where their origin comes from.
They have some very English origins in some way. Some of them are really droll like the word googly which is the wrong one. So you pretend to turn bowler like break and it actually comes into you. And it's so called because it made the batsman's eyes googly.
So that's where the googly comes from. So it's a queen and English. It makes eyes googly. It's a good googly.
So something sort of derivative from that is the Chinaman delivery. Also relevant in this match because India's first Chinaman bowler, Kultip Singh made his debut in the Damshara test. So China Man bowler is basically a left arm unorthodox spin bowler. And this is a very interesting definition.
It's something that is such a cricket thing. I mean the etymology of this term. So what happened was there was a test match between England and West Indies long back in the 1930s. And there was this West Indies bowler of Chinese origin called Elis Achang.
And he was bowling left arm unorthodox spin but the term wasn't Chinaman or anything. And he got the batsman out. This is a batsman called Walter Robbins. And he was out I think he was clean bowler something.
And he had never seen something like this before. So on his way back to the pavilion he said wow fancy being done by a bloody Chinaman. And so that term stuck. Another very interesting one and very relevant to our episode here about the word umpire itself.
The umpire evidently stems from the French word numpair which means not equal or odd man. This is to imply that the odd man is called in to make decisions between two contestants. So you have the odd man out kind of coming and making the decisions for you. So I'm pretty sure we could go on and on if we stopped for the origin of cricket in terms of its best to leave it at this stage.
So yeah it was most educational for me to find out that a game as a struggling for the modules. So this is yeah it was good and it's always good to see people trying to use technology to make sports better. So hopefully we've given you enough to talk about cricket with your cricket crazy uncle the next time you're stuck watching a match. And if you don't remember anything just say it's all fixed.
It's all fixed. Exactly guys. And again so thank you so much for listening to Simplified. Subscribe to Simplified if you don't already.
Also we have a host of other awesome shows on the IndusWaks Media Network. You'll find them all on the IVM Facebook page or website. Or can we just suggest downloading the handy-dandy app so that we can spam you for life. Thank you very much guys.
See you in a fortnight. Bye-bye.